Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz , Mainz, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain , Mainz, Germany.
Platelets. 2020 Nov 16;31(8):981-988. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2019.1701185. Epub 2019 Dec 8.
The exploration of thrombotic mechanisms relies on the application of blood collection methods from laboratory mice with a minimal pre-activation of platelets and the clotting system. So far, very little is known on how the blood collection method and the anticoagulant used influence pre-activation of mouse platelets and coagulation. To determine the most suitable blood collection method, we systematically compared blood collection by heart puncture, puncture, and puncture of the retro-orbital vein plexus and the use of citrate, heparin, and EDTA as frequently used anticoagulants with regard to platelet activation and whole blood clotting parameters. The activation of platelet-rich plasma diluted in Tyrode's buffer was analyzed by flow cytometry, analyzing the exposure of P-selectin and activated integrin αβ. Clotting of whole blood was profiled by thrombelastometry. Puncture of the retro-orbital vein plexus by plastic capillaries is not superior in terms of blood volume and platelet pre-activation, whereas heart puncture and puncture resulted in similarly high blood volumes. Cardiac puncture and puncture did not result in pre-activated platelets with citrate as an anticoagulant, but the use of EDTA resulted in increased levels of integrin αβ activation. Puncture of the retro-orbital vein plexus by plastic capillaries resulted in increased platelet integrin αβ activation, which could be prevented by soaking with citrate or coating with heparin. Further, activation of coagulation in citrated whole blood by puncture of the retro-orbital vein plexus using a blunt plastic capillary was observed by thromboelastometry. The use of citrate is the optimal anticoagulant in mouse platelet assays. Blood collections from the heart or represent reliable alternatives to retro-orbital puncture of the vein plexus to avoid pre-activation of platelets and coagulation.
血栓形成机制的探索依赖于应用实验室小鼠的血液采集方法,这些方法应尽量减少血小板和凝血系统的预激活。到目前为止,人们对血液采集方法和所用抗凝剂如何影响小鼠血小板的预激活和凝血知之甚少。为了确定最适合的采血方法,我们系统地比较了心脏穿刺、眼眶后静脉丛穿刺和 穿刺以及使用柠檬酸、肝素和 EDTA 作为常用抗凝剂时,对血小板活化和全血凝血参数的影响。通过流式细胞术分析在 Tyrode 缓冲液中稀释的富含血小板血浆的激活情况,分析 P-选择素和活化整合素 αβ 的暴露情况。通过血栓弹性描记法分析全血的凝血情况。用塑料毛细管进行眼眶后静脉丛穿刺在采血量和血小板预激活方面并不优于其他方法,而心脏穿刺和 穿刺则产生了相似的高采血量。用柠檬酸作为抗凝剂时,心脏穿刺和 穿刺不会导致血小板预激活,但 EDTA 的使用会导致整合素 αβ 激活水平升高。用塑料毛细管进行眼眶后静脉丛穿刺会导致血小板整合素 αβ 激活增加,这种增加可以通过用柠檬酸浸泡或用肝素包被来预防。此外,通过用钝塑料毛细管进行眼眶后静脉丛穿刺,柠檬酸抗凝的全血中的凝血也被血栓弹性描记法激活。在小鼠血小板检测中,柠檬酸是最佳的抗凝剂。从心脏或 采集血液是避免血小板和凝血预激活的眼眶后静脉丛穿刺的可靠替代方法。