Dang-Tan Tam, Kamble Pravin S, Meah Yunus, Gamble Cory, Ganguly Rahul, Horter Libby
Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ, USA.
Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., Louisville, KY, USA.
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):213-228. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00739-3. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
Liraglutide and sitagliptin were compared on glycemic control and all-cause healthcare costs over a 1-year period among older adults with type 2 diabetes (65-89 years) enrolled in a national Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug health plan.
This was a retrospective study in which the index date was the first prescription fill for liraglutide or sitagliptin between 25 January 2010 and 31 December 2014. Post-index treatment persistence and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) at baseline and 1 year (± 90 days) post-index date were required. Patients were excluded if their record included use of insulin during the baseline period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using stabilized weights was employed with final covariate adjusted regression modeling to estimate the primary outcome (mean change in HbA1) and secondary outcomes (achieving glycemic goal and costs), each at 1-year post-index date.
Overall, 3056 patients met the selection criteria, of whom 218 filled prescriptions for liraglutide and 2838 for sitagliptin. Adjusted mean change in HbA1 at 1 year post-index was - 0.42 with liraglutide versus - 0.12 with sitagliptin (P = 0.0012). Adjusted odds of achieving the treatment goals of HbA1 < 7% and achieving an HbA1 reduction of ≥ 1% were higher for those on liraglutide than for those on sitagliptin (1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.24 and 1.76, 95% CI 1.31-2.36), respectively. Total healthcare costs in those achieving an HbA1 of < 7% were not significantly different between treatment groups but were higher within the liraglutide group for those achieving an HbA1 < 8%.
When compared to sitagliptin, liraglutide was associated with greater achievement of an HbA1 < 7% over a 1-year period in an older population. This finding was not associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause total healthcare costs, although costs were slightly higher in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group.
在一项全国性医疗保险优势处方药健康计划中,对年龄在65至89岁的2型糖尿病老年患者,在1年时间内比较了利拉鲁肽和西他列汀对血糖控制及全因医疗费用的影响。
这是一项回顾性研究,索引日期为2010年1月25日至2014年12月31日期间首次开具利拉鲁肽或西他列汀处方的日期。要求记录索引日期后1年(±90天)的治疗持续时间以及基线和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1)水平。如果患者记录显示在基线期使用过胰岛素,则将其排除。采用稳定权重的治疗加权逆概率法,并结合最终协变量调整回归模型,以估计索引日期后1年的主要结局(HbA1的平均变化)和次要结局(实现血糖目标及费用)。
总体而言,3056例患者符合入选标准,其中218例开具了利拉鲁肽处方,2838例开具了西他列汀处方。索引日期后1年,利拉鲁肽组HbA1的调整后平均变化为-0.42,西他列汀组为-0.12(P = 0.0012)。利拉鲁肽组实现HbA1<7%治疗目标及HbA1降低≥1%的调整后优势比分别高于西他列汀组(分别为1.68, 95%置信区间[CI] 1.25 - 2.24和1.76, 95% CI 1.31 - 2.36)。HbA1<7%的患者中,治疗组间总医疗费用无显著差异,但在HbA1<8%的患者中,利拉鲁肽组费用更高。
与西他列汀相比,在老年人群中,利拉鲁肽在1年时间内与实现HbA1<7%的情况更佳相关。这一发现与全因总医疗费用的统计学显著增加无关,尽管利拉鲁肽组的费用略高于西他列汀组。