Liang Emily H, Chen Lie H, Macy Eric
Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Department of Allergy, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.
Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Health Care Program, Pasadena, Calif.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Apr;8(4):1302-1313.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.035. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
Limited population-based data on penicillin-, carbapenem-, monobactam-, and clindamycin-associated reported adverse reactions exist.
To collect data on penicillin, carbapenem, monobactam, and clindamycin usage and associated adverse reactions.
Data from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017, in Kaiser Permanente Southern California were collected.
There were 6,144,422 unique individuals, mean age 33.6 ± 21.1 years, 52.2% females, with at least 1 health care visit during the 9-year study interval, for a total of 37,387,313 patient-years of follow-up. This population was exposed to 5,617,402 courses of oral penicillins, 370,478 courses of parenteral penicillins, 59,645 courses of parenteral carbapenems or monobactams, 817,232 courses of oral clindamycin, and 215,880 courses of parenteral clindamycin. New penicillin allergies were reported more commonly after parenteral (0.85%) compared with oral (0.74%) exposures (P < .0001). There were 22 cases (1 in 255,320) of oral penicillin-associated anaphylaxis and 3 cases (1 in 123,792) of parenteral penicillin-associated anaphylaxis (P < .001). There were 2 clindamycin-associated anaphylaxis cases, 1 (1 in 817,232) oral and 1 (1 in 215,880) parenteral. There were 2 (1 in 2,993,940) penicillin-associated serious cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) cases, but both also had co-trimoxazole coexposure within 45 days. There was 1 (1 in 1,033,112) clindamycin-associated SCAR. Clostridioides difficile infection was more common after parenteral exposures, and with extended-spectrum penicillins, beta-lactamase combinations, carbapenems, monobactam, and clindamycin exposures compared with oral penicillins or clindamycin.
Only 1 of 1543 (0.065%) oral and 1 of 1030 (0.097%) parenteral penicillin-associated allergy reports were confirmed to be anaphylaxis. C. difficile was more common after parenteral versus oral penicillin, carbapenem, monobactam, and clindamycin exposures, and with broader spectrum antibiotic exposures.
关于青霉素、碳青霉烯类、单环β-内酰胺类和克林霉素相关不良反应的基于人群的数据有限。
收集青霉素、碳青霉烯类、单环β-内酰胺类和克林霉素的使用情况及相关不良反应的数据。
收集了2009年1月1日至2017年12月31日南加州凯撒医疗集团的数据。
共有6,144,422名个体,平均年龄33.6±21.1岁,女性占52.2%,在9年的研究期间至少有1次医疗就诊,随访总人年数为37,387,313。该人群接受了5,617,402疗程的口服青霉素、370,478疗程的注射用青霉素、59,645疗程的注射用碳青霉烯类或单环β-内酰胺类、817,232疗程的口服克林霉素和215,880疗程的注射用克林霉素。注射用青霉素暴露后报告新的青霉素过敏的情况比口服青霉素暴露后更常见(分别为0.85%和0.74%,P<.0001)。有22例(255,320例中有1例)口服青霉素相关的过敏反应,3例(123,792例中有1例)注射用青霉素相关的过敏反应(P<.001)。有2例克林霉素相关的过敏反应,1例(817,232例中有1例)口服,1例(215,880例中有1例)注射。有2例(2,993,940例中有1例)青霉素相关的严重皮肤不良反应(SCAR)病例,但这两例在45天内也同时暴露于复方新诺明。有1例(1,033,112例中有1例)克林霉素相关的SCAR。艰难梭菌感染在注射用药暴露后更常见,在使用广谱青霉素、β-内酰胺酶联合制剂、碳青霉烯类、单环β-内酰胺类和克林霉素后比口服青霉素或克林霉素更常见。
1543例(0.065%)口服青霉素相关过敏报告和1030例(0.097%)注射用青霉素相关过敏报告中分别只有1例被确认为过敏反应。与口服青霉素、碳青霉烯类单环β-内酰胺类和克林霉素相比,注射用药后艰难梭菌感染更常见,使用广谱抗生素后也是如此。