Comparison of the utility of clinical breast examination and MRI in the surveillance of women with a high risk of breast cancer.

AIM

To review surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical breast examinations (CBE) performed for women at high risk of breast cancer in order to determine recall and cancer-detection rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected on all surveillance MRI examinations performed at St James's Hospital in 2016 for women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Data collected included age, indication for MRI, MRI score, ultrasound indications and scores, and histology findings. Ultrasound scores were recorded from CBEs that received a score of ≥3.

RESULTS

A total of 385 breast surveillance MRI examinations and CBEs were performed for women at high risk of breast cancer. A recall rate of 11.2% was documented for breast MRI examinations, whereas a recall rate of 6.2% was identified for CBEs. The biopsy rate was 6.2% for MRI and 0.2% for CBE. The cancer detection rate was 1.6% or 16 per 1,000 for MRI screening and 0% for CBE.

CONCLUSION

The high cancer detection rate in the present study supports the unparalleled sensitivity of breast MRI surveillance. Furthermore, the present study did not identify any breast cancers through CBE, suggesting it is not a critical component of the surveillance programme of high-risk women. The current UK guidelines recommending a target recall rate of 7% were not met in the present study or by other studies in the literature, collectively suggesting the guidelines may not be reflective of what is attainable in clinical practice.