CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC 3169, Australia.
CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag 12, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 20;704:135345. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135345. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
Intensification of the dairy industry globally, combined with a changing climate, has placed increased pressure on natural capital assets (and the flow of ecosystem services) on farms. Agroforestry is widely promoted as an intervention to address these issues. While some benefits of integrating trees on farms, such as carbon sequestration and biodiversity, are reasonably well known, less is known about other potential benefits, such as on-farm production. Understanding and quantifying these benefits would inform farm planning and decision-making. We used a systematic review approach to analyse the evidence base for biophysical ecosystem services from woody systems (including shelterbelts, riparian plantings, plantations, pasture trees, silvopasture and remnant native vegetation) provided to grazed dairy enterprises. We identified 83 publications containing 123 records that fit our review criteria of reporting on biophysical ecosystem services from woody systems on dairy farms relative to a grazed pasture comparison. For each relationship between a woody system and ecosystem service, we assessed the level of support, strength and predominant direction of evidence, and summarised the causal relationships (woody system ≫ mechanism ≫ outcome). Shelterbelts and riparian plantings were the most commonly reported woody systems. Linkages between woody systems and ecosystem services were largely positive, with the types of services provided and their importance differing among systems. Mean evaluation scores for the strength of the evidence were moderate to strong. However, the number of records for each relationship was often low. Consequently, only eight of the 30 causal pathways identified had high confidence; a further 14 had medium confidence indicating that these have good potential to deliver benefits but warrant further work. Although the evidence here was largely qualitative, our results provide strong support for the internal benefits that natural capital assets, such as on-farm woody systems, can provide to the productivity and resilience of grazed dairy enterprises.
全球乳业的集约化发展,加之气候变化的影响,给农场的自然资本资产(以及生态系统服务的流动)带来了更大的压力。因此,农林业被广泛推广为解决这些问题的一种干预措施。虽然在农场中整合树木的一些好处,如碳封存和生物多样性,已经得到了相当程度的了解,但对于其他潜在的好处,如农场内的生产,了解得就较少了。了解和量化这些好处将为农场规划和决策提供信息。我们采用系统评价方法,分析了木质系统(包括防风林、河岸种植、人工林、牧场树木、林牧复合系统和残余原生植被)为放牧奶牛企业提供的生物物理生态系统服务的证据基础。我们确定了 83 篇符合我们的审查标准的出版物,其中包含 123 条记录,这些记录报告了木质系统相对于放牧草地对照在奶牛农场提供的生物物理生态系统服务。对于木质系统和生态系统服务之间的每一种关系,我们评估了证据的支持程度、强度和主要方向,并总结了因果关系(木质系统≫机制≫结果)。防风林和河岸种植是最常报道的木质系统。木质系统与生态系统服务之间的联系主要是积极的,提供的服务类型及其在系统中的重要性也有所不同。证据强度的平均评估得分中等至较强。然而,每个关系的记录数量往往较低。因此,在所确定的 30 个因果途径中,只有 8 个具有高置信度;另有 14 个具有中等置信度,这表明这些途径有很好的潜在效益,但需要进一步研究。虽然这里的证据主要是定性的,但我们的结果为自然资本资产(如农场内的木质系统)为放牧奶牛企业的生产力和恢复力提供的内部效益提供了强有力的支持。