Suppr超能文献

评估Sysmex XN自动造血祖细胞计数在外周血干细胞采集时机中的应用。

Evaluation of the Sysmex XN automated hematopoietic progenitor cell enumeration for timing of peripheral blood stem cell harvest.

作者信息

Söderström Anna, Møller Bjarne Kuno, Sørensen Betina Samuelsen

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2020 Apr;59(2):102683. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2019.102683. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enumeration of stem cells is essential in the management of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest. An alternative to the gold standard flow cytometric CD34+ stem cell count is the fully automated hematopoietic stem cell (HPC) count on the Sysmex XN hematology analyzer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients and healthy stem cell donors who underwent PBSC harvest were included in the study. Stem cells were enumerated in pre-harvest peripheral blood and the apheresis yield by both flow cytometric CD34+ stem cell enumeration and by the Sysmex XN HPC count.

RESULTS

The Sysmex HPC concentration overestimated the CD34+ stem cell concentration by a ratio of 1.3 in average. The agreement between the two methods was poor at concentration <40 stem cells/μL (Bias: 45 %, 95 % limits of agreement: -71 - 160 %). CD34+ stem cell concentration and HPC concentration correlated well in pre-harvest peripheral blood (R=0.73, slope=0.96). We established a positive cut off >43.5 HPC/μL, where PBSC harvest can be initiated. And a negative cut off <16.5 HPC/μL, where harvest should be postponed or other mobilizing regimens or bone marrow harvest should be considered. 33 % of measurements were in between the negative and positive cut-off and would require a supplementary CD34+ cell count.

CONCLUSION

Although Sysmex HPC count correlates well with CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood, the agreement between the two methods is poor, especially at low concentrations, namely in the clinical decision range. Sysmex HPC count as a surrogate for CD34+ cell count should, therefore, be used with caution.

摘要

背景

干细胞计数在外周血干细胞(PBSC)采集管理中至关重要。金标准流式细胞术CD34+干细胞计数的一种替代方法是在Sysmex XN血液分析仪上进行全自动造血干细胞(HPC)计数。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了89例接受PBSC采集的患者和健康干细胞供者。通过流式细胞术CD34+干细胞计数和Sysmex XN HPC计数对采集前外周血中的干细胞进行计数,并计算单采产量。

结果

Sysmex HPC浓度平均高估CD34+干细胞浓度1.3倍。两种方法在浓度<40个干细胞/μL时一致性较差(偏差:45%,95%一致性界限:-71 - 160%)。采集前外周血中CD34+干细胞浓度与HPC浓度相关性良好(R = 0.73,斜率 = 0.96)。我们确定了一个阳性临界值>43.5 HPC/μL,此时可开始进行PBSC采集;以及一个阴性临界值<16.5 HPC/μL,此时应推迟采集或考虑其他动员方案或骨髓采集。33%的测量值处于阴性和阳性临界值之间,需要补充CD34+细胞计数。

结论

尽管Sysmex HPC计数与外周血中CD34+细胞计数相关性良好,但两种方法的一致性较差,尤其是在低浓度时,即在临床决策范围内。因此,应谨慎使用Sysmex HPC计数作为CD34+细胞计数的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验