Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e031891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031891.
To examine trends in smoking prevalence in key venues (workplaces, restaurants, bars) and in public support for comprehensive smoke-free laws, with comparisons between cities and rural areas in China.
Data are from Waves 3-5 (2009-2015) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey, a cohort survey of smokers and non-smokers. Logistic regression analyses employing generalised estimating equations assessed changes in smoking prevalence and support for smoke-free laws over time; specific tests assessed whether partial smoking bans implemented in three cities between Waves 3 and 4 had greater impact.
Face-to-face surveys were conducted in seven cities (Beijing, Changsha, Guangzhou, Kunming, Shanghai, Shenyang and Yinchuan) and five rural areas (Changzhi, Huzhou, Tongren, Yichun and Xining).
In each survey location at each wave, a representative sample of approximately 800 smokers and 200 non-smokers (aged 18+) were selected using a multistage cluster sampling design.
Prevalence of smoking (whether respondents noticed smoking inside restaurants, bars and workplaces); smoking rules inside these venues; and support for complete smoking bans in these venues.
Although smoking prevalence decreased and support increased over time, neither trend was greater in cities that implemented partial smoke-free laws. Smoking was higher in rural than urban workplaces (62% vs 44%, p<0.01), but was equally high in all restaurants and bars. There were generally no differences in secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure between smokers and non-smokers except in rural workplaces (74% vs 58%, p<0.05). Support for comprehensive bans was equally high across locations.
Partial laws have had no effect on reducing SHS in China. There is an urgent need for comprehensive smoke-free laws to protect the public from exposure to deadly tobacco smoke in both urban and rural areas. The high support among Chinese smokers for such a law demonstrates that public support is not a barrier for action.
在中国的城市和农村地区之间比较,检查主要场所(工作场所、餐馆、酒吧)吸烟率的趋势和对全面无烟法律的支持,与过去相比。
数据来自国际烟草控制(ITC)中国调查的第 3-5 波(2009-2015 年),这是一项对吸烟者和非吸烟者的队列调查。采用广义估计方程的逻辑回归分析评估了吸烟率和对无烟法律的支持随时间的变化;具体测试评估了 3 波和 4 波之间在三个城市实施的部分禁烟令是否有更大的影响。
在北京、长沙、广州、昆明、上海、沈阳和银川等七个城市和长治、湖州、铜仁、宜春和西宁等五个农村地区进行了面对面调查。
在每一轮调查中,每个调查地点都使用多阶段聚类抽样设计选择了大约 800 名吸烟者和 200 名非吸烟者(年龄在 18 岁以上)的代表性样本。
吸烟率(无论受访者是否注意到餐厅、酒吧和工作场所内吸烟);这些场所内的吸烟规则;以及对这些场所全面禁烟的支持。
尽管吸烟率随着时间的推移而下降,支持率也有所上升,但在实施部分无烟法律的城市,这两种趋势都没有更大。农村工作场所的吸烟率高于城市(62%比 44%,p<0.01),但所有餐馆和酒吧的吸烟率都很高。除了在农村工作场所(74%比 58%,p<0.05),吸烟者和非吸烟者之间的二手烟(SHS)暴露率一般没有差异。在所有地点,对全面禁令的支持率都很高。
部分法律对减少中国的 SHS 没有影响。迫切需要全面的无烟法律来保护公众免受城市和农村地区致命烟草烟雾的侵害。中国吸烟者对这样一项法律的高度支持表明,公众支持不是采取行动的障碍。