• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性肾损伤电子警报:在英格兰将其纳入二级保健中的实施情况的混合方法规范进程理论评估。

Acute kidney injury electronic alerts: mixed methods Normalisation Process Theory evaluation of their implementation into secondary care in England.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e032925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032925.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032925
PMID:31831546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6924771/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Around one in five emergency hospital admissions are affected by acute kidney injury (AKI). To address poor quality of care in relation to AKI, electronic alerts (e-alerts) are mandated across primary and secondary care in England and Wales. Evidence of the benefit of AKI e-alerts remains conflicting, with at least some uncertainty explained by poor or unclear implementation. The objective of this study was to identify factors relating to implementation, using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), which promote or inhibit use of AKI e-alerts in secondary care.

DESIGN

Mixed methods combining qualitative (observations, semi-structured interviews) and quantitative (survey) methods.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Three secondary care hospitals in North East England, representing two distinct AKI e-alerting systems. Observations (>44 hours) were conducted in Emergency Assessment Units (EAUs). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (n=29) from EAUs, vascular or general surgery or care of the elderly. Qualitative data were supplemented by Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) surveys (n=101).

ANALYSIS

Qualitative data were analysed using the NPT framework, with quantitative data analysed descriptively and using χ and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for differences in current and future normalisation.

RESULTS

Participants reported familiarity with the AKI e-alerts but that the e-alerts would become more normalised in the future (p<0.001). No single NPT mechanism led to current (un)successful implementation of the e-alerts, but analysis of the underlying subconstructs identified several mechanisms indicative of successful normalisation (internalisation, ) or unsuccessful normalisation (, , , systematisation).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians recognised the value and importance of AKI e-alerts in their practice, although this was not sufficient for the e-alerts to be routinely engaged with by clinicians. To further normalise the use of AKI e-alerts, there is a need for tailored training on use of the e-alerts and routine feedback to clinicians on the impact that e-alerts have on patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

约五分之一的急诊住院患者受到急性肾损伤(AKI)的影响。为了解决 AKI 护理质量差的问题,英国和威尔士的初级和二级保健机构都强制使用电子警报(e-alerts)。AKI e-alerts 的益处的证据仍然存在冲突,至少有一些不确定性可以通过实施情况差或不明确来解释。本研究的目的是使用规范化进程理论(NPT)确定与实施相关的因素,这些因素促进或抑制二级保健中 AKI e-alerts 的使用。

设计

结合定性(观察、半结构化访谈)和定量(调查)方法的混合方法。

地点和参与者

英格兰东北部的三家二级保健医院,代表两种不同的 AKI 警报系统。在急症评估单位(EAUs)进行了超过 44 小时的观察。对来自急症评估单位、血管或普外科或老年护理科的临床医生(n=29)进行了半结构化访谈。定性数据由规范化测量开发(NoMAD)调查(n=101)补充。

分析

使用 NPT 框架分析定性数据,使用描述性方法和 χ 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析当前和未来规范化的差异。

结果

参与者报告熟悉 AKI e-alerts,但 e-alerts 在未来会更加规范化(p<0.001)。没有单一的 NPT 机制导致当前(未)成功实施 e-alerts,但对潜在子结构的分析确定了几个表明成功规范化(内化)或不成功规范化(、、、系统化)的机制。

结论

临床医生认识到 AKI e-alerts 在实践中的价值和重要性,尽管这还不足以使临床医生常规使用 e-alerts。为了进一步规范 AKI e-alerts 的使用,需要针对 e-alerts 的使用进行有针对性的培训,并定期向临床医生反馈 e-alerts 对患者结果的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9485/6924771/4d7a7ea4e550/bmjopen-2019-032925f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9485/6924771/4d7a7ea4e550/bmjopen-2019-032925f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9485/6924771/4d7a7ea4e550/bmjopen-2019-032925f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Acute kidney injury electronic alerts: mixed methods Normalisation Process Theory evaluation of their implementation into secondary care in England.急性肾损伤电子警报:在英格兰将其纳入二级保健中的实施情况的混合方法规范进程理论评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e032925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032925.
2
The implementation, use and sustainability of a clinical decision support system for medication optimisation in primary care: A qualitative evaluation.临床决策支持系统在初级保健中优化药物治疗的实施、使用和可持续性:定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250946. eCollection 2021.
3
Electronic alerts for acute kidney injury across primary and secondary care.电子警报在初级和二级保健中用于急性肾损伤。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 May;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000956.
4
Implementation of clinical decision support to manage acute kidney injury in secondary care: an ethnographic study.实施临床决策支持以管理二级保健中的急性肾损伤:一项民族志研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 May;29(5):382-389. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009932. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Preventing Acute Kidney Injury: a qualitative study exploring 'sick day rules' implementation in primary care.预防急性肾损伤:一项探索基层医疗中“患病日规则”实施情况的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 22;17:91. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0480-5.
6
Understanding the implementation of 'sick day guidance' to prevent acute kidney injury across a primary care setting in England: a qualitative evaluation.理解在英格兰的初级保健环境中实施“病假指导”以预防急性肾损伤的情况:一项定性评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e017241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017241.
7
Impact of Electronic Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Alerts With Automated Nephrologist Consultation on Detection and Severity of AKI: A Quality Improvement Study.电子急性肾损伤 (AKI) 警报与自动肾脏病专家咨询对 AKI 的检测和严重程度的影响:一项质量改进研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jan;71(1):9-19. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Using a linked database for epidemiology across the primary and secondary care divide: acute kidney injury.利用一个跨越初级和二级医疗界限的关联数据库进行流行病学研究:急性肾损伤
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0503-8.
9
Views and Uses of Sepsis Digital Alerts in National Health Service Trusts in England: Qualitative Study With Health Care Professionals.英格兰国民保健署信托机构中脓毒症数字警报的看法和用途:医护专业人员的定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 15;11:e56949. doi: 10.2196/56949.
10
Development and initial implementation of electronic clinical decision supports for recognition and management of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury.开发和初步实施电子临床决策支持,以识别和管理医院获得性急性肾损伤。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01303-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping regional implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count': mixed-methods evaluation of implementation stage, strategies, barriers and facilitators of implementation.绘制“让每次接触都算数”的区域实施情况图:实施阶段、实施策略、障碍和促进因素的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):e084208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084208.
2
Geriatric Assessment in CKD Care: An Implementation Study.慢性肾脏病护理中的老年评估:一项实施研究。
Kidney Med. 2024 Mar 21;6(5):100809. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100809. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Information displays for automated surveillance algorithms of in-hospital patient deterioration: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).改进复杂干预措施的规范化:第 2 部分 - 基于规范进程理论(NPT)评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具的验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0591-x.
2
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).优化复杂干预措施的规范化:第 1 部分 - 根据规范化进程理论(NPT)开发评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y.
3
用于院内患者病情恶化的自动化监测算法的信息显示:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):256-273. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad203.
4
Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach.重症监护病房中与临床决策支持系统交互的促进因素和障碍:一种混合方法研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Aug 25;5(9):e0967. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000967. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Can Artificial Intelligence Assist in Delivering Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy?人工智能能否辅助持续肾脏替代治疗?
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2022 Sep;29(5):439-449. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2022.08.001.
6
Prior to Implementation of Digital Pathology-Assessment of Expectations among Staff by Means of Normalization Process Theory.在实施数字病理学之前——通过规范过程理论评估员工的期望。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127253.
7
Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development.实施评估和研究的转化框架:定性研究和仪器开发的规范化进程理论编码手册。
Implement Sci. 2022 Feb 22;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x.
Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.
运用常态化进程理论对复杂医疗干预措施的可行性研究和进程评估:系统综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1.
4
Automated acute kidney injury alerts.自动化急性肾损伤警报。
Kidney Int. 2018 Sep;94(3):484-490. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
A narrative review of the impact of interventions in acute kidney injury.干预急性肾损伤的影响的叙述性综述。
J Nephrol. 2018 Aug;31(4):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s40620-017-0454-2. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Impact of Electronic Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Alerts With Automated Nephrologist Consultation on Detection and Severity of AKI: A Quality Improvement Study.电子急性肾损伤 (AKI) 警报与自动肾脏病专家咨询对 AKI 的检测和严重程度的影响:一项质量改进研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jan;71(1):9-19. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Electronic Alerts for Acute Kidney Injury.急性肾损伤的电子警报
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Jan 9;114(1-02):1-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0001.
8
Association between e-alert implementation for detection of acute kidney injury and outcomes: a systematic review.用于检测急性肾损伤的电子警报实施与预后之间的关联:一项系统评价
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Feb 1;32(2):265-272. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw424.
9
PReSaFe: A model of barriers and facilitators to patients providing feedback on experiences of safety.PReSaFe:一个关于患者提供安全体验反馈的障碍和促进因素的模型。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):771-778. doi: 10.1111/hex.12516. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Provider acceptance of an automated electronic alert for acute kidney injury.医疗服务提供者对急性肾损伤自动电子警报的接受情况。
Clin Kidney J. 2016 Aug;9(4):567-71. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw054. Epub 2016 Jun 10.