• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植中“ Hors Tour ”分配与标准 MELD 分配供体的比较:单中心审计及对法国肝源库的影响。

Liver Transplantation with "Hors Tour" Allocated Versus Standard MELD Allocated Grafts: Single-Center Audit and Impact on the Liver Pool in France.

机构信息

Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Sud, Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94000, Villejuif, France.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):912-924. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05271-w.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-019-05271-w
PMID:31832704
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The French transplant governing system defined "Rescue" (the so-called "Hors Tour") livers as those livers which were declined for the five top-listed patients. This study compares the outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) in patients who received a donor liver through a rescue allocation (RA) procedure or according to MELD score priority (standard allocation, SA) and evaluates the impact on the graft pool of a proactive policy to accept RA grafts.

METHODS

Data from all consecutive patients who underwent LT with SA or RA grafts from 2011 to 2015 were compared in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The 249 elective first LTs were performed with 64 (25.7%) RA and 185 (74.3%) SA grafts. RA grafts were obtained from older donors and were associated with a longer cold ischemia time. Recipients of RA livers were older and had lower MELD scores. The rates of delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, retransplantation, complications, and mortality were similar between the RA and SA groups. At 1 and 3 and 5 years, graft and patient survival rates were similar between the groups. These results were maintained after matching on recipient characteristics. Our proactive policy to accept RA grafts increased the liver pool for elective first transplantation by 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

RA livers can be safely transplanted into selected recipients and significantly expand the liver pool.

摘要

背景

法国移植管理系统将“抢救”(所谓的“ Hors Tour ”)肝脏定义为因五个最高优先级患者而被拒绝的肝脏。本研究比较了通过抢救性分配(RA)程序或根据 MELD 评分优先(标准分配,SA)接受供体肝脏进行肝移植(LT)的患者的结果,并评估了接受 RA 移植物的积极政策对移植物库的影响。

方法

比较了 2011 年至 2015 年期间接受 SA 或 RA 移植物的连续所有患者的短期和长期结果。

结果

249 例择期首次 LT 中有 64 例(25.7%)为 RA 移植物和 185 例(74.3%)SA 移植物。RA 移植物来自年龄较大的供体,并伴有较长的冷缺血时间。RA 肝脏受体年龄较大,MELD 评分较低。RA 和 SA 组之间的延迟移植物功能,原发性无功能,再次移植,并发症和死亡率相似。在 1 年,3 年和 5 年时,两组之间的移植物和患者存活率相似。在对受体特征进行匹配后,这些结果得以维持。我们接受 RA 移植物的积极政策将择期首次移植的肝脏库增加了 25%。

结论

RA 肝脏可以安全地移植到选定的受体中,并可显著扩大肝脏库。

相似文献

1
Liver Transplantation with "Hors Tour" Allocated Versus Standard MELD Allocated Grafts: Single-Center Audit and Impact on the Liver Pool in France.肝移植中“ Hors Tour ”分配与标准 MELD 分配供体的比较:单中心审计及对法国肝源库的影响。
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):912-924. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05271-w.
2
Early- and long-term outcomes of liver transplantation with rescue allocation grafts.肝移植中救援分配供体的早期和长期结果。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Jan;35(1):e14046. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14046. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
3
Recipient Selection for Optimal Utilization of Discarded Grafts in Liver Transplantation.受者选择以优化肝移植中废弃供肝的利用。
Transplantation. 2018 May;102(5):775-782. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002069.
4
Rescue allocation for liver transplantation within Eurotransplant: the Heidelberg experience.在 Eurotransplant 内进行肝移植的救援分配:海德堡经验。
Clin Transplant. 2009 Dec;23 Suppl 21:42-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01109.x.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Split-Liver Transplantation in a Nascent Framework of Deceased Donation.在新兴的脑死亡器官捐献框架下活体肝移植的可行性与安全性
Liver Transpl. 2019 Mar;25(3):450-458. doi: 10.1002/lt.25405.
6
Surgical Aspects of Liver Transplantation and Domino Liver Transplantation in Maple Syrup Urine Disease: Analysis of 15 Donor-Recipient Pairs.枫糖尿症肝移植和多米诺肝移植的手术相关问题:15 对供受者的分析。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Jun;25(6):889-900. doi: 10.1002/lt.25423. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
7
Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics.通过供体和受体特征的策略性匹配优化再次肝移植移植物的效用。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/lt.24138.
8
Expanding the donor pool: Donation after circulatory death and living liver donation do not compromise the results of liver transplantation.扩大供体池:循环死亡后捐献和活体肝移植不会影响肝移植的结果。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Jun;24(6):779-789. doi: 10.1002/lt.25068. Epub 2018 May 14.
9
Allocation procedure has no impact on patient and graft outcome after liver transplantation.肝移植后,分配程序对患者和移植物的结果没有影响。
Transpl Int. 2013 Sep;26(9):886-92. doi: 10.1111/tri.12144. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
10
Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation: Impact of Extended Criteria Grafts.肝移植后慢性肾脏病:扩展标准供体的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Jun;25(6):922-933. doi: 10.1002/lt.25468.

引用本文的文献

1
Should we use liver grafts repeatedly refused by other transplant teams?我们应该使用被其他移植团队反复拒绝的肝脏移植物吗?
JHEP Rep. 2020 May 4;2(4):100118. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100118. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
"Hors Tour" Liver Grafts: A Step Towards Optimal Donor and Recipient Matching?“边缘供肝”肝移植:迈向供受体最佳匹配的一步?
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):925-926. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05341-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the new MELD-based allocation system on waiting list and post-transplant survival - a cohort analysis using the French national CRISTAL database.基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)的新分配系统对等待名单和移植后生存率的影响——一项使用法国国家CRISTAL数据库的队列分析
Transpl Int. 2019 May 10. doi: 10.1111/tri.13448.
2
Liver Transplantation in France.法国的肝脏移植。
Liver Transpl. 2019 May;25(5):763-770. doi: 10.1002/lt.25419. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
3
Utilization of Declined Liver Grafts Yields Comparable Transplant Outcomes and Previous Decline Should Not Be a Deterrent to Graft Use.
利用被拒绝的肝脏移植物可获得可比的移植结果,之前的拒绝不应该成为使用移植物的障碍。
Transplantation. 2018 May;102(5):e211-e218. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002127.
4
Recipient Selection for Optimal Utilization of Discarded Grafts in Liver Transplantation.受者选择以优化肝移植中废弃供肝的利用。
Transplantation. 2018 May;102(5):775-782. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002069.
5
Expanding the Margins: High Volume Utilization of Marginal Liver Grafts Among >2000 Liver Transplants at a Single Institution.拓展边缘:单一机构2000多例肝移植中边缘性肝移植的高容量利用
Ann Surg. 2017 Sep;266(3):441-449. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002383.
6
OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Liver.器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络2015年度数据报告:肝脏
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17 Suppl 1:174-251. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14126.
7
Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews.外科医生手术量与手术结果之间的关系:系统评价的系统综述
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;5(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4.
8
Living or Brain-dead Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Western, Intent-to-treat Cohort Study.肝细胞癌的活体或脑死亡供体肝移植:一项多中心、西方、意向性治疗队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):1035-1044. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001986.
9
Risk Avoidance and Liver Transplantation: A Single-center Experience in a National Network.风险规避与肝移植:国家网络中单中心的经验。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):778-786. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001887.
10
Intention to Split Policy: A Successful Strategy in a Combined Pediatric and Adult Liver Transplant Center.分拆政策意向:联合儿科与成人肝脏移植中心的成功策略
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):1009-1015. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001816.