Implant survival or implant success? Evaluation of implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients-a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES

Definition of implant success is unclear in prosthetic implant-based rehabilitation of head neck cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with 309 inserted implants were included in this prospective observational study. Implant survival (in situ and loaded) and implant success (modified Albrektsson criteria) at 2-year follow-up were evaluated under the influence of patient- and implant-specific variables.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with 234 implants finished the study. Overall implant survival after 2 years was 92.3% (216/234) with an osseointegration rate of 94% (220/234). Implant success was 78.6% (184/234). Main reasons for failure were "bone resorption > 1.7mm" (n = 27, 11.5%) and "implant not in situ or not loaded" (n = 18, 7.7%). Smoking (OR 3.1, p = 0.034), bone grafts (OR 2.4, p = 0.021) and radiation dose > 60 Gy (OR 3.8, p = 0.025) revealed as significant predictors for implant failure.

CONCLUSION

Implant survival differs significantly from implant success in head and neck cancer patients. Implant success is mainly determined by radiographic peri-implant bone resorption.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Dealing with head and neck cancer patients a higher amount of peri-implant bone resorption must be taken into account and warrants for intensified implant monitoring.