Suppr超能文献

Tinder 和 Grindr 的使用是否有风险?将场所与个人行为区分开来作为性风险的独特预测因素。

Is Tinder-Grindr Use Risky? Distinguishing Venue from Individuals' Behavior as Unique Predictors of Sexual Risk.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, 462 Meliora Hall, RC Box 270266, Rochester, NY, 14627-0266, USA.

Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2020 May;49(4):1263-1277. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01594-w. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Abstract

Geosocial networking apps (GSN; e.g., Tinder, Grindr) have rapidly increased in popularity, showing associations with greater sexual risk-taking. This study sought to distinguish between risks associated with intensive partner-seeking (i.e., individuals seeking out casual sex frequently across many venues) and risks associated with specific venues (e.g., GSNs, dating websites, offline activities). Expanding upon a literature predominantly focused on the population of men who have sex with men (MSM), we recruited a broader range of sexual identities. A convenience sample of 3180 participants from the U.S. (18-75 years old, 69% female, 75% Caucasian, 68% heterosexual) completed an anonymous, cross-sectional online survey. Logistic regressions yielded adjusted odds ratios highlighting the unique links between each predictor and sexual risk-taking. MSM/WSW indicators, quantity of partner-seeking and specific venues-particularly GSN use-emerged as robust predictors of sexual risk, increasing the odds of reporting all six outcomes examined: (1) having three or more sex partners in the last year, (2) having hookups in the last 2 months, (3) having hookups involving alcohol or (4) drug use, (5) condomless sexual activity with new partners in the last 2 months, and (6) ever having had a sexually transmitted infection. Although a large portion of risk originated from the proclivities of the individuals seeking casual sex, both online and offline methods of partner-seeking also contributed significant risk, suggesting that specific venues like GSN apps could be used as methods of targeting higher-risk behaviors. The results also highlight the importance of moving beyond MSM when addressing sexual risk.

摘要

基于位置的社交网络应用(GSN;例如 Tinder、Grindr)迅速普及,与更大的性冒险行为有关。本研究旨在区分与密集型伴侣寻求(即频繁在多个场所寻找随意性行为的个体)相关的风险与与特定场所(例如 GSN、约会网站、线下活动)相关的风险。本研究在主要关注男男性行为者(MSM)人群的文献基础上进行扩展,招募了更广泛的性身份群体。我们从美国招募了一个方便的 3180 名参与者样本(18-75 岁,69%为女性,75%为白种人,68%为异性恋),完成了一项匿名的横断面在线调查。逻辑回归得出了调整后的优势比,突出了每个预测因子与性冒险行为之间的独特联系。MSM/WSW 指标、伴侣寻求数量以及特定场所——特别是 GSN 的使用——是性风险的强有力预测因素,增加了报告以下六种结果的几率:(1)在过去一年中有三个或更多性伴侣,(2)在过去两个月中有过一夜情,(3)在过去两个月中有过涉及酒精或药物使用的一夜情,(4)与新伴侣无保护措施的性行为,以及(5)过去曾患有性传播感染。尽管大部分风险源于寻求随意性行为的个体的倾向,但在线和离线的伴侣寻求方式也会带来显著的风险,这表明像 GSN 应用这样的特定场所可以作为针对更高风险行为的方法。研究结果还强调了在解决性风险时超越 MSM 的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验