Müller Sabrina, Heidler Tobias, Fuchs Andreas, Pfaff Andreas, Ernst Kathrin, Ladinek Gunter, Wilke Thomas
Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics (IPAM), University of Wismar, Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966, Wismar, Germany.
GWQ PLUS, Tersteegenstrasse 28, 40474, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Neurol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):67-83. doi: 10.1007/s40120-019-00172-5. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
The aim of this study was to describe the real-word treatment and associated healthcare resource use (HCRU) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, as stratified by different MS subtypes.
All patients with MS continuously insured by two German statutory healthcare insurance funds from 2011 to 2015 were enrolled. These patients were categorized into four subgroups according to their MS type as follows: clinically isolated syndrome (CIS); relapsing remittent MS (RRMS); primary progressive MS (PPMS); and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Sociodemographic characteristics, treatments, and HCRU for 2015 were analyzed. Treatment cascades for treatment-naïve patients were also determined.
A total of 13,333 patients with MS were identified. The largest proportion of patients had RRMS (41.9%), followed by PPMS (17.1%). Mean age of the enrolled patients was 50.2 years, and 70.7% were female. Among all patients, 38.3% of those with CIS, 22.4% with PPMS, 69.6% with RRMS, and 33.9% with SPMS received a prescription of a disease-modifying immunomodulatory agent, with interferon beta-1a being the most frequently prescribed agent. Likewise, 14.5, 18.5, 19.9, and 21.5% of patients with CIS, PPMS, RRMS, and SPMS, respectively, received a flare-up treatment with glucocorticoids. MS-associated overall costs, including indirect costs for MS-associated days absent from work, were € 16,433, with costs related to MS medication (€ 8770; 53.4%) being the main driver of costs in all subgroups. MS-associated costs according to MS subtypes were € 12,427 for CIS patients, € 14,459 for PPMS patients, € 20,583 for RRMS patients, and € 17,554 for SPMS patients.
Among the four MS subtypes, RRMS patients most often received a disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment. Consequently, healthcare costs were highest for patients with this MS subtype. Contrary to the treatment guideline, a substantial percentage of patients with CIS, RRMS, and SPMS did not receive any disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment.
本研究的目的是描述多发性硬化症(MS)患者的实际治疗情况以及相关医疗资源使用(HCRU),并按不同的MS亚型进行分层。
纳入2011年至2015年由两家德国法定医疗保险基金持续承保的所有MS患者。这些患者根据其MS类型分为四个亚组,如下:临床孤立综合征(CIS);复发缓解型MS(RRMS);原发进展型MS(PPMS);继发进展型MS(SPMS)。分析了2015年的社会人口统计学特征、治疗情况和HCRU。还确定了初治患者的治疗级联。
共识别出13333例MS患者。患者比例最高的是RRMS(41.9%),其次是PPMS(17.1%)。纳入患者的平均年龄为50.2岁,70.7%为女性。在所有患者中,CIS患者中有38.3%、PPMS患者中有22.4%、RRMS患者中有69.6%、SPMS患者中有33.9%接受了疾病修正免疫调节剂处方,其中干扰素β-1a是最常开具的药物。同样,CIS、PPMS、RRMS和SPMS患者中分别有14.5%、18.5%、19.9%和21.5%接受了糖皮质激素的发作期治疗。与MS相关的总体成本,包括与MS相关的缺勤间接成本,为16433欧元,与MS药物相关的成本(8770欧元;53.4%)是所有亚组成本的主要驱动因素。根据MS亚型,CIS患者的MS相关成本为12427欧元,PPMS患者为14459欧元,RRMS患者为20583欧元,SPMS患者为17554欧元。
在四种MS亚型中,RRMS患者最常接受疾病修正免疫调节治疗。因此,这种MS亚型患者的医疗成本最高。与治疗指南相反,相当比例的CIS、RRMS和SPMS患者未接受任何疾病修正免疫调节治疗。