Suppr超能文献

抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性与抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性类风湿关节炎:影像学和超声检查中两种不同的侵蚀性疾病实体。

ACPA-positive versus ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis: two distinct erosive disease entities on radiography and ultrasonography.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Nancy, 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Department of Rheumatology, Academic Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2020 Apr;40(4):615-624. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04492-5. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence, localization, and severity of bone erosions on radiography (RX) and ultrasonography (US) according to ACPA status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). 78 patients with ACPA-positive (ACPA+) RA and 30 patients with ACPA-negative (ACPA-) RA fulfilling the ACR 1987 and/or ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria were consecutively included. On RX, a modified Sharp erosion score (SHSe) was evaluated by two blinded readers and one adjudicator for discordant cases (number of eroded joints ≤ three). On US, erosions were scored on six bilateral joints (MCP2, 3, 5; MTP2, 3, 5) with a four-point scale to calculate the total US score for erosions (USSe). The mean total SHSe and USSe were 3.7 and 4.4 times higher in the ACPA+ group than in the ACPA- group, respectively (P < 0.001). On both RX and US, the most discriminating joint between the two groups was MTP5, especially in cases with bilateral erosion. Based on multivariate analyses, ACPA + status was associated with erosive RA on RX according to the EULAR 2013 definition criteria [OR 4.4 (95% CI 1.2-16.4)], and on US according to the following two definitions: the presence of at least two eroded joint facets [OR 3.7 (95% CI 1.4-9.9)] or at least one grade 2 joint facet erosion [OR 9.0 (95% CI 2.8-28.4)]. Compared to ACPA- RA, ACPA + RA is associated independently with more severe erosive disease on RX and US. Both US and RX bilateral erosions in MTP5 joints are highly discriminant for ACPA + RA patients (97.8% in US and 100% in RX).

摘要

本研究旨在评估影像学(RX)和超声(US)检查中抗环瓜氨酸肽(ACPA)阳性和阴性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的骨侵蚀发生率、定位和严重程度。连续纳入 78 例 ACPA 阳性(ACPA+)RA 患者和 30 例 ACPA 阴性(ACPA-)RA 患者,这些患者符合 ACR 1987 标准和/或 ACR/EULAR 2010 标准。在 RX 上,两位盲法读者和一位裁决者对改良的 Sharp 侵蚀评分(SHSe)进行评估,对于不一致的病例(侵蚀关节数≤3 个),采用数字评分法。在 US 上,对六对双侧关节(MCP2、3、5;MTP2、3、5)进行侵蚀评分,采用四分制计算侵蚀的总 US 评分(USSe)。在 ACPA+组中,SHSe 和 USSe 的平均值分别比 ACPA-组高 3.7 和 4.4 倍(P<0.001)。在 RX 和 US 上,两组之间最具鉴别力的关节都是 MTP5,尤其是在双侧侵蚀的情况下。基于多变量分析,ACPA+状态与 RX 上根据 EULAR 2013 定义标准的侵蚀性 RA 相关[比值比(OR)4.4(95%置信区间 1.2-16.4)],与 US 上的以下两个定义相关:至少两个侵蚀关节面[OR 3.7(95%置信区间 1.4-9.9)]或至少一个 2 级关节面侵蚀[OR 9.0(95%置信区间 2.8-28.4)]。与 ACPA-RA 相比,ACPA+RA 独立与 RX 和 US 上更严重的侵蚀性疾病相关。在 MTP5 关节中,US 和 RX 双侧侵蚀对 ACPA+RA 患者具有高度鉴别力(US 为 97.8%,RX 为 100%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验