University of Florida.
Associazione Dalla Luna.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Sep;53(4):2429-2439. doi: 10.1002/jaba.666. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
Several studies have found that edible items tend to displace leisure items in multiple-stimulus preference assessments for individuals with developmental disabilities. One recent study (Conine & Vollmer, 2019) included screen-based technology devices in assessments and found that food items were less likely to displace leisure items and in some cases leisure items totally displaced edible items. The purpose of our study was to conduct a replication of Conine and Vollmer in Italy to evaluate cultural differences in food and leisure preferences. Results of our study were similar: For 44% of participants, at least one leisure item ranked above all edible items and leisure items displaced all edible items for 28% of participants. Participants in the present study showed a higher preference for leisure items or toys that were not screen-based technology devices, suggesting there may be cultural variation in the types of leisure items that are preferred.
多项研究发现,对于发展障碍者的多重刺激偏好评估中,可食用物品往往会取代休闲物品。最近的一项研究(Conine 和 Vollmer,2019)将基于屏幕的技术设备纳入评估中,发现食物不太可能取代休闲物品,在某些情况下,休闲物品完全取代了可食用物品。我们的研究目的是在意大利复制 Conine 和 Vollmer 的研究,以评估食物和休闲偏好的文化差异。我们的研究结果相似:对于 44%的参与者,至少有一个休闲项目的排名高于所有可食用物品,而 28%的参与者的休闲项目完全取代了所有可食用物品。本研究的参与者表现出对非基于屏幕的技术设备的休闲物品或玩具的更高偏好,这表明在偏好的休闲物品类型上可能存在文化差异。