Peeters Michael J, Cor M Ken
University of Toledo College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Mail Stop 1013, Toledo, OH 43614, United States.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3-209 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton T6G1C9, Alberta, Canada.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Jan;12(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
The term "high-stakes testing" is widely used among pharmacy educators, but the term often seems misused or used incompletely. This Teachable Moments Matter (TMM) focuses on the importance of scientific-rigor when assessing learners' abilities. This article discusses high-stakes testing - what it is and what it is not. This TMM is not meant as an extensive review of the topic.
As imperative for ethically-fair high-stakes testing, we will focus on defining and explaining high-stake testing, to include: evidence for validation, development of cut-scores, magnitudes of reliability coefficients, and other reliability measurement tools such as Generalizability Theory and Item-Response Theory.
From our perspectives as educational psychometricians, we hope that this discussion will help foster scientifically-rigorous use and reporting of high-stakes testing in pharmacy education and research.
“高风险测试”一词在药学教育工作者中被广泛使用,但这个词似乎经常被误用或使用不完整。这个“重要的教学时刻”(TMM)关注评估学习者能力时科学严谨性的重要性。本文讨论高风险测试——它是什么以及不是什么。这个TMM并非旨在对该主题进行全面综述。
作为道德公平的高风险测试的必要条件,我们将专注于定义和解释高风险测试,包括:效度验证的证据、及格分数的制定、信度系数的大小以及其他信度测量工具,如概化理论和项目反应理论。
从我们作为教育心理测量学家的角度来看,我们希望这次讨论将有助于在药学教育和研究中促进对高风险测试的科学严谨使用和报告。