Suppr超能文献

学习评估的验证:入门指南。

Validation of learning assessments: A primer.

作者信息

Peeters Michael J, Martin Beth A

机构信息

University of Toledo College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave, Mail Stop 1013, Toledo, OH 43614, United States.

University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705-2222, United States.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):925-933. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

Abstract

The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's Standards 2016 has placed greater emphasis on validating educational assessments. In this paper, we describe validity, reliability, and validation principles, drawing attention to the conceptual change that highlights one validity with multiple evidence sources; to this end, we recommend abandoning historical (confusing) terminology associated with the term validity. Further, we describe and apply Kane's framework (scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and implications) for the process of validation, with its inferences and conclusions from varied uses of assessment instruments by different colleges and schools of pharmacy. We then offer five practical recommendations that can improve reporting of validation evidence in pharmacy education literature. We describe application of these recommendations, including examples of validation evidence in the context of pharmacy education. After reading this article, the reader should be able to understand the current concept of validation, and use a framework as they validate and communicate their own institution's learning assessments.

摘要

药学教育认证委员会2016年标准更加重视验证教育评估。在本文中,我们阐述效度、信度和验证原则,提请注意概念上的变化,即强调一种效度有多种证据来源;为此,我们建议摒弃与效度一词相关的历史(易混淆)术语。此外,我们描述并应用凯恩的框架(评分、概括、外推和影响)进行验证过程,及其从不同药学院校对评估工具的不同使用中得出的推论和结论。然后,我们提供五条实用建议,可改进药学教育文献中验证证据的报告。我们描述这些建议的应用,包括药学教育背景下的验证证据示例。阅读本文后,读者应能够理解当前的验证概念,并在验证和交流自己机构的学习评估时使用一个框架。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验