• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密歇根州冲击波碎石术的应用:美国泌尿外科学会指南的遵从情况和临床意义。

Shockwave Lithotripsy Use in the State of Michigan: American Urological Association Guideline Adherence and Clinical Implications.

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Urology. 2020 Mar;137:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.037. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.037
PMID:31843621
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand how treatment of patients with urinary stones by shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) aligns with current published practice guidelines.

METHODS

We used the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative Reducing Operative Complications for Kidney Stones registry to understand SWL use in the state of Michigan. This prospectively maintained clinical registry includes data from community and academic urology practices and contains clinical and operative data for patients undergoing SWL and ureteroscopy (URS). We identified patients undergoing SWL from 2016 to 2019. In accordance with AUA guidelines, we evaluated practice patterns in relation to recommendations for treatment selection for SWL as well as clinical implications of guideline nonadherence.

RESULTS

Four thousand, two hundred and nine SWL procedures performed across 34 practices were analyzed. Perioperative antibiotics were administered to 61.3% of patients undergoing SWL. A ureteral stent was placed at the time of SWL in 2.7% of patients. For lower pole renal stones >1 cm or large (>2 cm) renal stones in the registry, 32.2% and 58.9% of patients, respectively, underwent SWL, while the remainder were treated with URS. In these instances, SWL was associated with inferior stone-free rate (SFR) relative to URS. In patients with residual stones after SWL, 34.6% were treated with repeat SWL with lower SFR than those treated with subsequent URS. Postoperatively, 42.1% of patients were prescribed alpha-blockers with no benefit seen in terms of SFR.

CONCLUSION

Substantial variation exists among urology practices with regard to SWL use. These data serve to inform quality improvement efforts regarding appropriateness criteria for SWL in Michigan.

摘要

目的

了解体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗尿路结石的方法是否符合当前发布的实践指南。

方法

我们使用密歇根州泌尿外科手术改进合作组织减少肾结石手术并发症登记处来了解密歇根州 SWL 的使用情况。这个前瞻性维护的临床登记处包括来自社区和学术泌尿科实践的数据,包含接受 SWL 和输尿管镜检查(URS)的患者的临床和手术数据。我们从 2016 年至 2019 年确定了接受 SWL 的患者。根据 AUA 指南,我们评估了治疗选择方面的实践模式以及指南不遵守的临床意义。

结果

在 34 家诊所进行了 4209 次 SWL 手术。接受 SWL 的患者中有 61.3%接受了围手术期抗生素治疗。在 2.7%的患者中,SWL 时放置了输尿管支架。在登记处中,对于下极肾结石>1cm 或大(>2cm)肾结石,分别有 32.2%和 58.9%的患者接受 SWL 治疗,而其余患者则接受 URS 治疗。在这些情况下,SWL 与 URS 相比,结石清除率(SFR)较低。在接受 SWL 治疗后仍有残余结石的患者中,有 34.6%的患者接受了重复 SWL 治疗,其 SFR 低于接受后续 URS 治疗的患者。术后,有 42.1%的患者接受了α受体阻滞剂治疗,但 SFR 方面没有获益。

结论

在 SWL 的使用方面,泌尿科实践之间存在很大差异。这些数据有助于为密歇根州 SWL 的适宜性标准提供质量改进工作的信息。

相似文献

1
Shockwave Lithotripsy Use in the State of Michigan: American Urological Association Guideline Adherence and Clinical Implications.密歇根州冲击波碎石术的应用:美国泌尿外科学会指南的遵从情况和临床意义。
Urology. 2020 Mar;137:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.037. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
2
Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.输尿管镜激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的成本效益比较。
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):639-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0669. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
3
Variation and Correlation in Postoperative Imaging After Shockwave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy by Treatment Modality: Results of a Statewide Clinical Registry.冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜术后影像学变化与相关性:一项全州临床登记研究结果。
Urology. 2022 Oct;168:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.029. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
Is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) still suitable for >1.5 cm intrarenal stones? Data analysis of 1902 SWLs.体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)是否仍适用于>1.5cm 的肾内结石?1902 例 SWL 的数据分析。
Scand J Urol. 2021 Oct;55(5):388-393. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1950830. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.输尿管镜激光碎石术与冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的成本效益比较
World J Urol. 2017 Jan;35(1):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1842-2. Epub 2016 May 5.
6
Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.输尿管镜术后术后影像学的使用情况存在差异:来自全州质量改进合作组织的结果。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.055. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
7
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜术治疗儿童上尿路结石的对比研究
J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0313.
8
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,比较非下极肾结石患者体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜碎石术的前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Feb 16;51(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01412-y.
9
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.≤2厘米肾结石的软性输尿管肾镜检查与冲击波碎石术:一项随机对照试验
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1816-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.输尿管镜术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的利弊:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of ureteral stone measurements for predicting the efficacy of a single session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: one-, two-, and three-dimensional computed tomography measurements.比较单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效预测:一维、二维和三维 CT 测量。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Mar 5;52(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01538-7.
2
Opioid-Free Discharge is Not Associated With Increased Unplanned Healthcare Encounters After Ureteroscopy: Results From a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.输尿管镜检查后无阿片类药物出院与计划外医疗保健的增加无关:来自全州质量改进合作的结果。
Urology. 2021 Dec;158:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.037. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
3
Ureteral Stent Placement following Ureteroscopy Increases Emergency Department Visits in a Statewide Surgical Collaborative.
输尿管镜检查后放置输尿管支架会增加全州外科协作的急诊就诊率。
J Urol. 2021 Jun;205(6):1710-1717. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001653. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Ureteroscopy in Patients Taking Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Therapy: Practice Patterns and Outcomes in a Surgical Collaborative.抗凝或抗血小板治疗患者的输尿管镜检查:外科协作中的实践模式和结果。
J Urol. 2021 Mar;205(3):833-840. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001416. Epub 2020 Oct 9.