Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;5(2):167-174. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4748.
For patients awaiting heart transplant, hepatitis C-positive donors offer an opportunity to expand the donor pool, shorten wait times, and decrease wait-list mortality. While early reported outcomes among few heart transplant recipients have been promising, knowledge of 1-year outcomes in larger cohorts of patients is critical to shared decision-making with patients about this option.
To better define the association of hepatitis C-positive donors with heart transplant volumes, wait-list duration, the transmission and cure of donor-derived hepatitis C, and morbidity and mortality at 1 year.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective, single-center observational study of 80 adult (age 18 years or older) patients who underwent heart transplant using hearts from hepatitis C-positive donors between September 2016 and April 2019 at a large academic medical center. Among donors, who were considered hepatitis C-positive if results from hepatitis C antibody and/or nucleic acid testing were positive, 70 had viremia and 10 were seropositive but did not have viremia. Follow-up was available through May 15, 2019. Comparisons were drawn with patients who underwent transplant with hearts from hepatitis C-negative donors during the same period.
In addition to standard posttransplant management, transplant recipients who developed donor-derived hepatitis C infection were treated with direct-acting antivirals.
The main outcomes included wait-list duration and 1-year survival in all patients, and for those who developed donor-derived hepatitis C, the response to direct-acting antiviral treatment.
Of 80 patients, 57 (71.3%) were men, 55 (68.7%) were white, and 17 (26.3%) were black; the median age at transplant was 54.5 years (interquartile range, 46-62 years). Following consent to accept hearts from hepatitis C-exposed donors, the median days to heart transplant was 4 (interquartile range, 1-18). No recipients of donors with negative nucleic acid testing results (10 [12.5%]) developed donor-derived hepatitis C. Of 70 patients who were recipients of donors with positive nucleic acid testing results, 67 (95.7%) developed donor-derived hepatitis C over a median follow-up of 301 days (interquartile range, 142-617). Treatment with direct-acting antivirals was well tolerated and yielded sustained virologic responses in all treated patients. Within the cohort with infection, 1-year patient survival was 90.4%, which was not significantly different compared with the cohort without infection or with patients who received transplants from hepatitis C-negative donors during the same period.
In the era of direct-acting antivirals, hepatitis C-positive donors are a viable option to expand the donor pool, potentially reducing wait-list duration and mortality. In heart transplant recipients with donor-derived hepatitis C, infection is well-tolerated and curable, and 1-year survival is equivalent to that in recipients of hepatitis C-negative donors.
对于等待心脏移植的患者来说,丙型肝炎阳性供体提供了一个扩大供体库、缩短等待时间和降低等待名单死亡率的机会。虽然少数心脏移植受者的早期报告结果令人鼓舞,但了解更大队列患者的 1 年结果对于与患者就该选择进行共同决策至关重要。
更好地定义丙型肝炎阳性供体与心脏移植量、等待名单时间、供体源性丙型肝炎的传播和治愈以及 1 年时的发病率和死亡率之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究,纳入了 2016 年 9 月至 2019 年 4 月期间在一家大型学术医疗中心接受丙型肝炎阳性供体心脏移植的 80 名成年(年龄 18 岁或以上)患者。供体中,如果丙型肝炎抗体和/或核酸检测结果阳性,则被认为丙型肝炎阳性,其中 70 名供体有病毒血症,10 名供体血清阳性但无病毒血症。随访至 2019 年 5 月 15 日。与同期接受丙型肝炎阴性供体心脏移植的患者进行了比较。
除了标准的移植后管理外,发生供体源性丙型肝炎感染的移植受者接受了直接作用抗病毒药物治疗。
主要结局包括所有患者的等待名单时间和 1 年生存率,以及发生供体源性丙型肝炎的患者对直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的反应。
80 名患者中,57 名(71.3%)为男性,55 名(68.7%)为白人,17 名(26.3%)为黑人;移植时的中位年龄为 54.5 岁(四分位距,46-62 岁)。在同意接受丙型肝炎暴露供体的心脏后,中位心脏移植等待时间为 4 天(四分位距,1-18 天)。没有接受核酸检测结果为阴性的供体(10 [12.5%])的受者发生供体源性丙型肝炎。在接受核酸检测结果为阳性的 70 名患者中,中位随访 301 天(四分位距,142-617 天)后,67 名(95.7%)发生供体源性丙型肝炎。直接作用抗病毒药物治疗耐受性良好,所有接受治疗的患者均获得持续病毒学应答。在感染队列中,1 年患者生存率为 90.4%,与未感染或同期接受丙型肝炎阴性供体心脏移植的患者相比,差异无统计学意义。
在直接作用抗病毒药物时代,丙型肝炎阳性供体是扩大供体库的可行选择,可能会缩短等待名单时间和降低死亡率。在发生供体源性丙型肝炎的心脏移植受者中,感染耐受良好且可治愈,1 年生存率与接受丙型肝炎阴性供体心脏移植的受者相当。