Xing Lu, Wang Guoyu, Chen Ruiqi, Ren Jianhua, Qian Jiahui, Huang Yan
Department of Gynecology.
Delivery Room, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e18229. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018229.
The relationships between chorioamnionitis (CA) and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants remain controversial. The meta-analysis aims to evaluate the associations between CA and neurodevelopmental deficits in preterm infants.
All studies exploring the associations between CA and neurodevelopmental deficits in preterm infants were retrieved from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, OVID, EBSCO, ProQuest, CDSR, and CENTRAL. The NOS was used to evaluate the quality of the studies, RevMan was adopted to analyze the data.
Twelve studies involving 4267 preterm infants were included. The ORs across studies was 0.95 (P = .77, I = 51%) for cognitive deficits, 1.09 (P = .44, I = 10%) for psychomotor deficits, 1.21 (P = .08, I = 25%) for language deficits, 2.34 (P = .02, I = 0%) for performance intelligence quotient impairment and 2.81 (P = .03, I = 0%) for verbal intelligence quotient impairment. Subgroup analyses based on the severity of cognitive deficits indicated that CA might be correlated with severe cognitive deficits (P = .01, I = 0%) but not with mild cognitive deficits (P = .40, I = 19%). In terms of the CA category, clinical CA may be related to overall psychomotor deficits (P = .01, I = 25%) and overall language deficits (P < .00001, I = 23%) other than histological CA.
In preterm infants, CA might be a risk factor for performance and verbal intelligence quotient impairment and severe cognitive deficits, and clinical CA might be a risk factor for overall psychomotor and language deficits.
绒毛膜羊膜炎(CA)与早产儿神经发育结局之间的关系仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估CA与早产儿神经发育缺陷之间的关联。
从以下数据库检索所有探讨CA与早产儿神经发育缺陷之间关联的研究:PubMed、Embase、OVID、EBSCO、ProQuest、CDSR和CENTRAL。采用NOS评估研究质量,使用RevMan分析数据。
纳入了12项涉及4267例早产儿的研究。各项研究中,认知缺陷的比值比(OR)为0.95(P = 0.77,I = 51%),精神运动缺陷的OR为1.09(P = 0.44,I = 10%),语言缺陷的OR为1.21(P = 0.08,I = 25%),操作智商受损的OR为2.34(P = 0.02,I = 0%),言语智商受损的OR为2.81(P = 0.03,I = 0%)。基于认知缺陷严重程度的亚组分析表明,CA可能与严重认知缺陷相关(P = 0.01,I = 0%),但与轻度认知缺陷无关(P = 0.40,I = 19%)。就CA类别而言,与组织学CA相比,临床CA可能与整体精神运动缺陷(P = 0.01,I = 25%)和整体语言缺陷(P < 0.00001,I = 23%)有关。
在早产儿中,CA可能是操作和言语智商受损以及严重认知缺陷的危险因素,临床CA可能是整体精神运动和语言缺陷的危险因素。