Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University.
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):1288-1296. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1692148.
To evaluate the clinical value of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eligible studies were identified using PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, investigating the synergistic effect of TACE + MWA in the treatment of advanced HCC. Endpoints were the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates, local control rate (LCR), objective remission rate (ORR), and adverse event (AE). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size. Nine studies including 351 patients in the TACE + MWA group and 653 patients in the TACE group were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were in favor of TACE + MWA ( = 3.29, 95% CI 2.26-4.79; = 2.82, 95% CI 2.01-3.95; = 4.50, 95% CI 2.96-6.86; respectively). The pooled OR for the ORR and LCR were also in favor of TACE + MWA ( = 4.64, 95%CI 3.11-6.91; = 3.93, 95% CI 2.64-5.87; respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of severe AE was observed between TACE + MWA group and TACE group ( > .05). However, subgroup analysis showed that patients with tumor size >5 cm were more likely to be benefited from TACE + MWA, rather than patients with tumor size ≤5 cm. With the current data, we concluded that combination TACE and MWA was safe, and should be strongly recommended to unresectable patients with tumor size >5 cm, but TACE alone was enough for unresectable patients with tumor size ≤5 cm. However, the conclusion needs further validation.
为了评估经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合微波消融(MWA)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)的临床价值。使用 PubMed、MedLine、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 检索合格的研究,研究 TACE+MWA 联合治疗晚期 HCC 的协同作用。终点为 1、2 和 3 年生存率、局部控制率(LCR)、客观缓解率(ORR)和不良事件(AE)。使用优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来确定效果大小。这项荟萃分析纳入了 9 项研究,共 351 例 TACE+MWA 组患者和 653 例 TACE 组患者。1、2 和 3 年生存率的合并 OR 有利于 TACE+MWA(OR=3.29,95%CI 2.26-4.79;OR=2.82,95%CI 2.01-3.95;OR=4.50,95%CI 2.96-6.86)。ORR 和 LCR 的合并 OR 也有利于 TACE+MWA(OR=4.64,95%CI 3.11-6.91;OR=3.93,95%CI 2.64-5.87)。TACE+MWA 组和 TACE 组严重 AE 的发生率无显著差异(>0.05)。然而,亚组分析显示,肿瘤大小>5cm 的患者更有可能从 TACE+MWA 中获益,而肿瘤大小≤5cm 的患者则不然。根据目前的数据,我们得出结论,联合 TACE 和 MWA 是安全的,强烈推荐肿瘤大小>5cm 的不可切除患者采用,但肿瘤大小≤5cm 的不可切除患者单独采用 TACE 就足够了。然而,这一结论需要进一步验证。