Suppr超能文献

从患者角度学习以患者为中心:一个实际主义综述:BEME 指南第 60 号。

Learning from patients about patient-centredness: A realist review: BEME Guide No. 60.

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Center for Education Development and Research in Health Professions (CEDAR), University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2020 Apr;42(4):380-392. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1695767. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

Abstract

Patient-centred work is an essential part of contemporary medicine. Literature shows that educational interventions contribute to developing patient-centredness, but there is a lack of insight into the associated learning processes. Through reviewing articles about educational interventions involving patients, we aspire to develop a program theory that describes the processes through which the educational interventions are expected to result in change. The processes will clarify contextual elements (called contexts) and mechanisms connected to learning patient-centredness. In our realist review, an initial, rough program theory was generated during the scoping phase, we searched for relevant articles in PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL and Embase for all years before and through 2016. We included observational studies, case reports, interviews, and experimental studies in which the participants were students, residents, doctors, nurses or dentists. The relevance and rigour of the studies were taken into account during analysis. With deductive as well as inductive coding, we extended the rough program theory. In our review, we classified five different contexts which affect how upcoming professionals learn patient-centredness. These aspects are influenced through components in the intervention(s) related to the , the nd the We placed the mechanisms together in four clusters and to show how the development of (dimensions of) patient-centredness occurs. Three partial-program-theories (that together constituting a whole program theory) were developed, which show how different components of interventions within certain contexts will evoke mechanisms that contribute to patient-centredness. These theories may help us better understand how the roles of patients, learners and teachers interact with contexts such as the kind of knowledge that is considered legitimate or insight in the whole illness trajectory. Our partial program theories open up potential areas for future research and interventions that may benefit learners, teachers, and patients.

摘要

以患者为中心的工作是当代医学的重要组成部分。文献表明,教育干预有助于培养以患者为中心的理念,但对于相关学习过程缺乏深入了解。通过回顾涉及患者的教育干预文章,我们旨在开发一个程序理论,描述教育干预预期导致变化的过程。这些过程将阐明与学习以患者为中心相关的情境要素(称为情境)和机制。在我们的现实主义综述中,在范围界定阶段生成了一个初步的、粗略的程序理论,我们在 PubMed、PsycINFO、ERIC、CINAHL 和 Embase 中搜索了所有年份的相关文章,截至 2016 年。我们纳入了观察性研究、病例报告、访谈和实验研究,其中参与者是学生、住院医师、医生、护士或牙医。在分析过程中考虑了研究的相关性和严谨性。通过演绎和归纳编码,我们扩展了粗略的程序理论。在综述中,我们将影响未来专业人员学习以患者为中心的理念的五种不同情境进行了分类。这些方面受到干预措施中与 、 、 相关的组成部分的影响。我们将机制放在四个集群中 和 ,以展示以患者为中心的理念的发展过程。我们开发了三个部分程序理论(共同构成一个完整的程序理论),展示了在某些情境下,干预措施的不同组成部分将如何引发有助于以患者为中心的理念的机制。这些理论可以帮助我们更好地理解患者、学习者和教师的角色如何与情境(如被认为是合法的知识类型或对整个疾病轨迹的洞察力)相互作用。我们的部分程序理论为未来的研究和干预措施开辟了潜在的领域,这些研究和干预措施可能使学习者、教师和患者受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验