• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在六个欧洲国家中对促进型医患关系量表进行心理测量学测试。

Psychometric testing of the facilitative student-patient relationship scale within six EUROPEAN countries.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Department of Nursing, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, Lithuania.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):2319-2328. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1485. Epub 2022 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1485
PMID:36404294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10006592/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the study was to test the psychometric properties of the Facilitative Student-Patient Relationship (FSPR) Scale in clinical practicum in hospital settings within six European countries.

DESIGN

A multi-country, cross-sectional survey design was applied.

METHODS

A convenience sample of graduating nursing students (N = 1,796) completed the FSPR Scale. Psychometric testing was carried out through explorative factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

Both validity and reliability of the scale were confirmed. The explorative factor analysis yielded a two-factor construct explaining 47.7% of the total variance, identifying two sub-scales: caring relationship and learning relationship. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-factor structure. The Cronbach alpha coefficients (0.8-0.9) indicated acceptable reliability of the scale.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验 Facilitative Student-Patient Relationship(FSPR)量表在六个欧洲国家医院临床实习中的心理测量学特性。

设计

采用多国、横断面调查设计。

方法

采用方便抽样法,对即将毕业的护理专业学生(N=1796)进行 FSPR 量表的测试。通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析进行心理测量学测试。采用克朗巴赫α系数评估内部一致性。

结果

量表的效度和信度均得到了确认。探索性因子分析产生了一个解释总方差 47.7%的两因素结构,确定了两个子量表:关怀关系和学习关系。验证性因子分析也证实了两因素结构。量表的克朗巴赫α系数(0.8-0.9)表明其具有可接受的信度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a262/10006592/dbde0e677abd/NOP2-10-2319-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a262/10006592/99c31dd4d373/NOP2-10-2319-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a262/10006592/dbde0e677abd/NOP2-10-2319-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a262/10006592/99c31dd4d373/NOP2-10-2319-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a262/10006592/dbde0e677abd/NOP2-10-2319-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric testing of the facilitative student-patient relationship scale within six EUROPEAN countries.在六个欧洲国家中对促进型医患关系量表进行心理测量学测试。
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):2319-2328. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1485. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Verbal and Social Interaction Questionnaire: A cross-sectional study among nursing students in China.言语和社会互动问卷的跨文化调适和心理测量测试:中国护理学生的横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2181-2196. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14811. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
3
Core Competence in Fundamental Nursing Practicum Scale: A validity and reliability analysis.基础护理实践核心能力量表:效度和信度分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103352. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103352. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
Psychometric evaluation of undergraduate student nurses' learning perceived needs in disaster nursing: Two cross-sectional studies.本科护生灾难护理学习需求感知的心理测量学评价:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104208. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104208. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
5
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Friedman life balance scale among nursing students: A psychometric analysis.护理专业学生 Friedman 生活平衡量表中文版的翻译与验证:心理计量学分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jan;66:103505. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103505. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
6
Validity and reliability of the English version of the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire among Arabic-speaking undergraduate students at health sciences colleges: A cross-sectional study.健康科学学院阿拉伯语本科学生英文版学生循证实践问卷的有效性和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Nov;118:105525. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105525. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
7
Psychometric properties assessment of Chinese version of work readiness scale for graduate nurses (WRS-GN) and associated factors of work readiness: Two cross-sectional studies.中文版护士工作准备度量表(WRS-GN)的心理计量学特性评估及其工作准备度的相关因素:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104416. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Irish Assertiveness Scale among Saudi undergraduate nursing students and interns.沙特阿拉伯本科护理学生和实习护士的爱尔兰自信量表阿拉伯语版本的心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0255159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255159. eCollection 2021.
9
Clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher (CLES+T) scale: Translation and validation of the Arabic version.临床学习环境、监督和护士教师 (CLES+T) 量表:阿拉伯文版本的翻译与验证。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103374. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103374. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Psychometric assessment of the cultural capacity scale Spanish version in Chilean nursing students.文化能力量表西班牙语版在智利护理学生中的心理测量评估。
Int Nurs Rev. 2018 Jun;65(2):262-269. doi: 10.1111/inr.12388. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A European evaluation of the patients' role in clinical education: A six-country cross sectional study.欧洲对临床教育中患者角色的评估:六国横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Feb;59:103287. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103287. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Defining and characterising the nurse-patient relationship: A concept analysis.界定与描述护患关系:一项概念分析
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Mar;29(2):462-484. doi: 10.1177/09697330211046651. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
Characteristics and processes of the dedicated education unit practice education model for undergraduate nursing students: a scoping review.
本科护生专科实践教育模式的特征与过程:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Nov 1;19(11):2993-3039. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00462.
4
Adoption of the concept of person-centred care into discourse in Europe: a systematic literature review.在欧洲话语中采用以患者为中心的护理理念:系统文献回顾。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Sep 13;35(9):265-280. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2021-0008.
5
Healthcare student-patient relationship and the quality of the clinical learning environment - a cross-sectional study.医学生与患者的关系及临床学习环境质量——一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 22;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02676-x.
6
Impact of nursing students on the quality of care perceived by patients: a systematic review of the literature.护理学生对患者感知的护理质量的影响:文献系统评价。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Mar;25(6):2711-2725. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202103_25434.
7
Clinical learning environment and graduating nursing students' competence: A multi-country cross-sectional study.临床学习环境与毕业护理学生的能力:一项多国家横断面研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2021 Jun;23(2):398-410. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12819. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Assessment of the nurse-patient interaction competence in undergraduate nursing students.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104627. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104627. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
9
Nursing student-patient relationship - a 10-year comparison study in Finland.护生-患者关系 - 芬兰的一项 10 年比较研究。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2020 Nov 6;17(1):/j/ijnes.2020.17.issue-1/ijnes-2019-0125/ijnes-2019-0125.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2019-0125.
10
Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: A systematic review.欧洲各地对患者和公众参与的态度和方法:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):18-27. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13111. Epub 2020 Jul 23.