Rosdahl Jullia A, Zhang Wenlan, Manjunath Varsha
Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Dec 13;10:1039-1044. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S237076. eCollection 2019.
Chart rounds have traditionally been used effectively for clinical teaching in ophthalmology. The introduction of the electronic health record has altered practice patterns and some evidence suggests interference with resident education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of chart rounds in our ophthalmology department and to see if a simple intervention, an "education button", could positively impact clinical teaching.
We used a cross-sectional survey, and pre- and post-intervention surveys to assess the utility of an intervention - an "education button".
Department of Ophthalmology at Duke University, a tertiary care academic ophthalmology practice, in Durham, North Carolina.
Ophthalmology trainees (37), including residents and clinical fellows, and clinical faculty (50) in the department were surveyed anonymously. The overall response rate for the cross-sectional survey was 83% (72/87). The overall response rate for the educational study was 53% for the first time-point and 59% for the second time-point.
For the cross-sectional survey, trainees found chart rounds to be useful and would like to increase their frequency. Most faculty reported doing them regularly, although not having enough time was the most common barrier (76% of the faculty). In the pre- and post-assessment of the "education button" (overall response rate 53%), the overall impression was positive with the button easy to use, but the implementation of the button did not appear to change the quality or frequency of chart rounds; nor did it appear to have an effect on covering learning objectives.
While the "education button" could help with communication between the faculty and trainees during a busy clinic session to identify cases for discussion, it did not address the most common barrier identified by faculty members, that of not having enough time.
传统上,病历讨论会在眼科临床教学中得到了有效应用。电子健康记录的引入改变了执业模式,一些证据表明这对住院医师教育产生了干扰。本研究的目的是调查我们眼科科室病历讨论会的使用情况,并探讨一种简单的干预措施——“教育按钮”是否能对临床教学产生积极影响。
我们采用了横断面调查以及干预前后调查,以评估一种干预措施——“教育按钮”的效用。
北卡罗来纳州达勒姆市杜克大学眼科系,一家三级医疗学术眼科机构。
对该科室的眼科实习生(37名,包括住院医师和临床 fellows)以及临床教员(50名)进行了匿名调查。横断面调查的总体回复率为83%(72/87)。教育研究的总体回复率在第一个时间点为53%,在第二个时间点为59%。
在横断面调查中,实习生们认为病历讨论会很有用,并希望增加其频率。大多数教员报告说他们经常进行病历讨论会,尽管时间不足是最常见的障碍(76%的教员)。在对“教育按钮”的前后评估中(总体回复率53%),总体印象是积极的,该按钮易于使用,但按钮的实施似乎并未改变病历讨论会的质量或频率;也似乎没有对涵盖学习目标产生影响。
虽然“教育按钮”在繁忙的门诊期间有助于教员和实习生之间的沟通,以确定讨论的病例,但它并未解决教员们指出的最常见障碍,即时间不足的问题。