Suppr超能文献

[风蚀抑尘剂抑尘效率测试方法的应用]

[Application of Test Method for Dust Suppression Efficiency of Wind Erosion Dust Suppressant].

作者信息

Qin Jian-Ping, Li Bei-Bei, Yang Tao, Song Bo, Huang Yu-Hu, Zhang Chun-Lai

机构信息

National Engineering Research Center of Urban Environmental Pollution Control, Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China.

College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2019 Sep 8;40(9):3935-3941. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201901242.

Abstract

Wind erosion dust suppressant is an effective measure for controlling wind erosion dust. This study used the Portable In-Situ Wind Erosion Laboratory (PI-SWERL) to evaluate the efficiency of domestic and foreign dust suppressants and to compare their control efficiency of PM in terms of spraying methods, dilution factors, and wind speed. The following results were noted.① According to the recommended dilution factor, G and Enviroseal (ES) dust suppressant solutions were treated and tested, respectively. The control efficiency of particulate matter with diameters less than 2.5 μm (PM) corresponding to the droplet spraying method was better than the atomized spraying method; the G dust suppressant efficiency, at 99.5%, was better than ES and water, at 94.0% and 77.5%, respectively, at 17.2 m·s, which is equivalent to grade 8 wind. ② The G dust suppressant with dilution factors of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 400 times was tested. The dust suppression efficiency at a wind speed of 17.2 m·s was 99.7%, 99.5%, 99.7%, 98.1%, and 95.9%, respectively. The best cost-effective dilution factor of G dust suppressant was 150 times. The efficiency of dust suppressants increased when the wind speed increased between 13.1 m·s and 17.2 m·s. ③ The method of using PI-SWERL to test the efficiency of wind erosion dust suppressant can quantify the suppression efficiency of dust suppressant on PM. It is recommended to conduct dust suppression during effective periods and to practice environmentally friendly methods of wind erosion dust suppression.

摘要

风蚀抑尘剂是控制风蚀扬尘的有效措施。本研究利用便携式原位风蚀实验室(PI-SWERL)评估国内外抑尘剂的效率,并从喷洒方式、稀释倍数和风速方面比较它们对可吸入颗粒物(PM)的抑制效果。结果如下:①按照推荐稀释倍数分别对G和Enviroseal(ES)抑尘剂溶液进行处理和测试。对于直径小于2.5μm的颗粒物(PM),液滴喷洒方式的控制效果优于雾化喷洒方式;在相当于8级风的17.2m·s风速下,G抑尘剂的效率为99.5%,优于ES和水,ES的效率为94.0%,水的效率为77.5%。②对稀释倍数为50、100、150、200和400倍的G抑尘剂进行测试。在17.2m·s风速下的抑尘效率分别为99.7%、99.5%、99.7%、98.1%和95.9%。G抑尘剂性价比最佳的稀释倍数为150倍。当风速在13.1m·s至17.2m·s之间增加时,抑尘剂的效率提高。③利用PI-SWERL测试风蚀抑尘剂效率的方法能够量化抑尘剂对PM的抑制效果。建议在有效期内进行抑尘,并采用环保的风蚀抑尘方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验