Suppr超能文献

快速序贯器官衰竭评估和改良 Baux 评分对烧伤患者的预测价值。

Predictive value of quick SOFA and revised Baux scores in burn patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, HSC-L4-050 Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8350, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, HSC-L4-050 Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8350, United States.

出版信息

Burns. 2020 Mar;46(2):347-351. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

Abstract

Several scoring systems, such as the Baux score, help predict outcomes in burn patients. The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score (composed of a respiratory rate of 22/min or greater, systolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg or less, and altered mental status) is a new bedside index proposed to help identify patients with suspected infection at risk of complications. We hypothesized that qSOFA scores would be associated with in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and length of stay (LOS) in patients with burns. We performed a retrospective review of all burn patients admitted between January 2010-March 2017 at an academic, suburban, hospital with a regional burn center. qSOFA scores were calculated as 1 point each for GCS<15, RR≥22, and SBP≤100. A qSOFA value of>2 was considered high risk. Revised Baux (rBaux) scores were calculated as age +%TBSA burned +17 (if inhalation injury). A rBaux score >140 was considered high risk. Univariate, multivariate and receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to compare qSOFA and rBaux scores. There were 1039 burn admissions during the study period. Mean age was 30 ± 24 years, 66% were male. Mean TBSA was 10 ± 12%, mean injury severity score was 5 ± 8. Mean hospital LOS was 8 ± 24 days, 22 patients (2.1%) died. qSOFA scores were associated with mortality and ICU admission. Of all patients, 80 were high risk by qSOFA and 7 by Baux scores. ROC characteristics of qSOFA and Baux scores for predicting death were sensitivity 36% vs. 32%, specificity 94% vs. 100%, PPV 13% vs. 100%, and NPV 98% vs. 99% respectively. The AUC for qSOFA (0.68 [95% CI, 0.54-0.81]) was lower than for Baux (0.99 [95%CI, 0.99-1.00]). Youden's index identified an optimal cutoff of 85 on the Baux score yielding sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%, PPV 27%, and NPV 100% for mortality. Our results indicate that while qSOFA scores were associated with outcomes, a rBaux score had greater predictive value. The optimal rBaux score for predicting all mortality and ICU admission was 85.

摘要

有几种评分系统,如 Baux 评分,有助于预测烧伤患者的预后。快速序贯器官衰竭评估 (qSOFA) 评分(由呼吸频率 22/min 或更高、收缩压 100mmHg 或更低以及精神状态改变组成)是一种新的床边指标,用于帮助识别疑似感染且有并发症风险的患者。我们假设 qSOFA 评分与烧伤患者的院内死亡率、入住 ICU 和住院时间 (LOS) 相关。我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月期间在一家学术性郊区医院(设有区域烧伤中心)住院的所有烧伤患者进行了回顾性研究。qSOFA 评分为格拉斯哥昏迷量表 (GCS)<15 记 1 分、RR≥22 记 1 分、收缩压≤100mmHg 记 1 分。qSOFA 值>2 被认为是高风险。修订后的 Baux(rBaux)评分计算方法为年龄+%TBSA 烧伤+17(如果有吸入性损伤)。rBaux 评分>140 被认为是高风险。进行了单变量、多变量和受试者工作特征分析,以比较 qSOFA 和 rBaux 评分。研究期间共有 1039 例烧伤患者。平均年龄为 30±24 岁,66%为男性。平均 TBSA 为 10±12%,平均损伤严重程度评分 5±8。平均住院 LOS 为 8±24 天,22 例(2.1%)患者死亡。qSOFA 评分与死亡率和 ICU 入院相关。在所有患者中,80 例患者 qSOFA 评分高风险,7 例患者 Baux 评分高风险。qSOFA 和 Baux 评分预测死亡的 ROC 特征分别为:敏感度 36%vs.32%,特异性 94%vs.100%,PPV 13%vs.100%,NPV 98%vs.99%。qSOFA 的 AUC 为 0.68(95%CI,0.54-0.81),低于 Baux(0.99[95%CI,0.99-1.00])。约登指数确定 Baux 评分的最佳截断值为 85,此时的敏感度为 100%,特异性为 94%,PPV 为 27%,NPV 为 100%。我们的结果表明,尽管 qSOFA 评分与结局相关,但 rBaux 评分具有更高的预测价值。预测所有死亡率和 ICU 入院的最佳 rBaux 评分为 85。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验