Nitzschke Stephanie, Offodile Anaeze C, Cauley Ryan P, Frankel Jason E, Beam Andrew, Elias Kevin M, Gibbons Fiona K, Salim Ali, Christopher Kenneth B
Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States.
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
Little is known about long term survival risk factors in critically ill burn patients who survive hospitalization. We hypothesized that patients with major burns who survive hospitalization would have favorable long term outcomes.
We performed a two center observational cohort study in 365 critically ill adult burn patients who survived to hospital discharge. The exposure of interest was major burn defined a priori as >20% total body surface area burned [TBSA]. The modified Baux score was determined by age + %TBSA+ 17(inhalational injury). The primary outcome was all-cause 5year mortality based on the US Social Security Administration Death Master File. Adjusted associations were estimated through fitting of multivariable logistic regression models. Our final model included adjustment for inhalational injury, presence of 3rd degree burn, gender and the acute organ failure score, a validated ICU risk-prediction score derived from age, ethnicity, surgery vs. medical patient type, comorbidity, sepsis and acute organ failure covariates. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression.
Of the cohort patients studied, 76% were male, 29% were non white, 14% were over 65, 32% had TBSA >20%, and 45% had inhalational injury. The mean age was 45, 92% had 2nd degree burns, 60% had 3rd degree burns, 21% received vasopressors, and 26% had sepsis. The mean TBSA was 20.1%. The mean modified Baux score was 72.8. Post hospital discharge 5year mortality rate was 9.0%. The 30day hospital readmission rate was 4%. Patients with major burns were significantly younger (41 vs. 47 years) had a significantly higher modified Baux score (89 vs. 62), and had significantly higher comorbidity, acute organ failure, inhalational injury and sepsis (all P<0.05). There were no differences in gender and the acute organ failure score between major and non-major burns. In the multivariable logistic regression model, major burn was associated with a 3 fold decreased odds of 5year post-discharge mortality compared to patients with TBSA<20% [OR=0.29 (95%CI 0.11-0.78; P=0.014)]. The adjusted model showed good discrimination [AUC 0.81 (95%CI 0.74-0.89)] and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ P=0.67). Cox proportional hazard multivariable regression modeling, adjusting for inhalational injury, presence of 3rd degree burn, gender and the acute organ failure score, showed that major burn was predictive of lower mortality following hospital admission [HR=0.34 (95% CI 0.15-0.76; P=0.009)]. The modified Baux score was not predictive for mortality following hospital discharge [OR 5year post-discharge mortality=1.00 (95%CI 0.99-1.02; P=0.74); HR for post-discharge mortality=1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.02; P=0.55)].
Critically ill patients with major burns who survive to hospital discharge have decreased 5year mortality compared to those with less severe burns. ICU Burn unit patients who survive to hospital discharge are younger with less comorbidities. The observed relationship is likely due to the relatively higher physiological reserve present in those who survive a Burn ICU course which may provide for a survival advantage during recovery after major burn.
对于住院存活的重症烧伤患者的长期生存风险因素,我们知之甚少。我们假设住院存活的重度烧伤患者会有良好的长期预后。
我们对365例存活至出院的成年重症烧伤患者进行了一项两中心观察性队列研究。感兴趣的暴露因素是预先定义为烧伤总面积(TBSA)>20%的重度烧伤。改良的博克斯评分由年龄+TBSA百分比+17(吸入性损伤)确定。主要结局是根据美国社会保障管理局死亡主文件得出的全因5年死亡率。通过拟合多变量逻辑回归模型估计调整后的关联。我们的最终模型包括对吸入性损伤、三度烧伤的存在、性别和急性器官衰竭评分的调整,急性器官衰竭评分是一种经过验证的ICU风险预测评分,源自年龄、种族、手术与内科患者类型、合并症、脓毒症和急性器官衰竭协变量。使用Cox比例风险回归进行事件发生时间分析。
在所研究的队列患者中,76%为男性,29%为非白人,14%年龄超过65岁,32%的TBSA>20%,45%有吸入性损伤。平均年龄为45岁,92%有二度烧伤,60%有三度烧伤,21%接受血管加压药治疗,26%有脓毒症。平均TBSA为20.1%。平均改良博克斯评分为72.8。出院后5年死亡率为9.0%。30天住院再入院率为4%。重度烧伤患者明显更年轻(41岁对47岁),改良博克斯评分明显更高(89对62),合并症、急性器官衰竭、吸入性损伤和脓毒症明显更多(所有P<0.05)。重度和非重度烧伤患者在性别和急性器官衰竭评分方面没有差异。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,与TBSA<20%的患者相比,重度烧伤与出院后5年死亡率降低3倍的几率相关[比值比(OR)=0.29(95%置信区间0.11 - 0.78;P = 0.014)]。调整后的模型显示出良好的区分度[曲线下面积(AUC)0.81(95%置信区间0.74 - 0.89)]和校准度(Hosmer - Lemeshow χ² P = 0.67)。Cox比例风险多变量回归建模,对吸入性损伤、三度烧伤的存在、性别和急性器官衰竭评分进行调整,结果显示重度烧伤可预测入院后较低的死亡率[风险比(HR)=0.34(95%置信区间0.15 - 0.76;P = 0.009)]。改良博克斯评分不能预测出院后的死亡率[出院后5年死亡率的OR = 1.00(95%置信区间0.99 - 1.02;P = 0.74);出院后死亡率的HR = 1.00(95%置信区间0.99 - 1.02;P = 0.55)]。
与烧伤较轻的患者相比,住院存活的重症重度烧伤患者5年死亡率降低。存活至出院的ICU烧伤科患者更年轻,合并症更少。观察到的这种关系可能是由于那些在烧伤ICU病程中存活下来的患者具有相对较高的生理储备,这可能在重度烧伤后的恢复过程中提供生存优势。