• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对 ATCC 微生物和 ICU 患者分离菌株的体外研究表明,一种含酒精的 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定商品(含或不含染料)的即刻和残留效果有显著提高。

An interesting increase in immediate and residual efficacy of a trade mark of alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, with and without dye, has been demonstrated by an in vitro study with ATCC micro-organisms and strains isolated from ICU patients.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Microbiology of the Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Becton-Dickinson &Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2020 May;128(5):1339-1346. doi: 10.1111/jam.14559. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1111/jam.14559
PMID:31860146
Abstract

AIM

ChloraPrep™ (CHP) is a clear solution of 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine (CHG) in 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol (IPA) administered with a specially designed sterile single-use applicator in which a tinting agent can be added to the CHP solution upon activation of applicator immediately prior to patient skin preparation (CHP+T). This study investigated whether the immediate and residual efficacy of CHP vs CHP+T and a stock solution of 2% CHG in 70% IPA varied, and whether CHP was compromised by the addition of the dye.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the immediate and residual activity (in 1 min) of 70% IPA with that of 2% CHG in 70% IPA stock solution prepared in the laboratory against CHP+T and CHP, against 22 micro-organisms (5 ATCC and 18 clinical isolates) on germ-carriers. CHP and CHP+T demonstrated superior immediate and residual efficacy compared to the 70% IPA plus 2% CHG in 70% IPA stock solutions. Each antiseptic tested showed greater efficacy against the Gram-positive bacteria than against the Gram-negative bacteria. However, their antimicrobial effect on yeasts was even lower.

CONCLUSIONS

CHP and CHP+T have superior immediate and residual efficacy compared to stock 70% IPA and 2% CHG in 70% IPA solutions, and CHP+T is not affected by the tinting agent.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

ChloraPrep is a product which can be stained just before use. We have demonstrated that the immediate and residual efficacy of the antimicrobial solution is not compromised by the dye. The efficacy of CHP is greater against bacteria than against yeasts obtained from ICU patients. Interestingly, CHP is more effective against bacteria than a formula made in the laboratory with the same basic components (2% chlorhexidine and 70% IPA). The intermittent heat sterilization process of the commercial preparation might hypothetically have improved the residual activity of the CHP solutions.

摘要

目的

ChloraPrep™(CHP)是一种 2%(w/v)洗必泰(CHG)在 70%(v/v)异丙醇(IPA)中的透明溶液,用专门设计的无菌一次性给药器给药,在给药器激活时可以向 CHP 溶液中添加着色剂,立即在患者皮肤准备之前(CHP+T)。本研究旨在探讨 CHP 与 CHP+T 和 2% CHG 在 70% IPA 储备溶液之间的即时和残留效果是否不同,以及添加染料是否会影响 CHP 的效果。

方法和结果

我们比较了 70%IPA 与实验室制备的 2% CHG 在 70%IPA 储备溶液之间的即时和残留活性(1 分钟),并与 CHP+T 和 CHP 一起用于携带细菌的 22 种微生物(5 种 ATCC 和 18 种临床分离株)。CHP 和 CHP+T 与 70%IPA 加 2% CHG 在 70%IPA 储备溶液相比,具有更好的即时和残留效果。每种消毒剂对革兰氏阳性菌的效果均优于革兰氏阴性菌。然而,它们对酵母菌的抗菌作用甚至更低。

结论

CHP 和 CHP+T 与 70%IPA 储备溶液和 2% CHG 在 70%IPA 溶液相比,具有更好的即时和残留效果,而且 CHP+T 不受着色剂的影响。

研究的意义和影响

ChloraPrep 是一种可以在使用前染色的产品。我们已经证明,抗菌溶液的即时和残留效果不受染料的影响。CHP 对 ICU 患者分离的细菌的效果大于对酵母菌的效果。有趣的是,CHP 对细菌的效果比实验室用相同基本成分(2%洗必泰,70%IPA)制成的配方更强。商业制剂的间歇性热灭菌过程可能会使 CHP 溶液的残留活性得到改善。

相似文献

1
An interesting increase in immediate and residual efficacy of a trade mark of alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, with and without dye, has been demonstrated by an in vitro study with ATCC micro-organisms and strains isolated from ICU patients.一项针对 ATCC 微生物和 ICU 患者分离菌株的体外研究表明,一种含酒精的 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定商品(含或不含染料)的即刻和残留效果有显著提高。
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 May;128(5):1339-1346. doi: 10.1111/jam.14559. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
A clinical study comparing the skin antisepsis and safety of ChloraPrep, 70% isopropyl alcohol, and 2% aqueous chlorhexidine.一项比较氯己定醇(ChloraPrep)、70%异丙醇和2%氯己定水溶液的皮肤消毒效果及安全性的临床研究。
J Infus Nurs. 2002 Jul-Aug;25(4):244-9. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200207000-00007.
3
Evaluation of a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol skin disinfectant.对含2%葡萄糖酸氯己定的70%异丙醇皮肤消毒剂的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2005 Dec;61(4):287-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.05.015. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
4
Antimicrobial persistence of two alcoholic preoperative skin preparation solutions.两种酒精性术前皮肤准备溶液的抗菌持久性。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Nov;129:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
Evaluation of activity and potential for development of antimicrobial resistance to a new tinted 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol film-forming sterile preoperative skin preparation.评价新型有色 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定/70%异丙醇成膜无菌术前皮肤准备制剂的抗菌活性和耐药潜力。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Jun;17:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Antimicrobial performance of two preoperative skin preparation solutions containing iodine and isopropyl alcohol.两种含碘和异丙醇的术前皮肤准备溶液的抗菌性能。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Jul;50(7):792-798. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.031. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
0.01% Hypochlorous Acid as an Alternative Skin Antiseptic: An In Vitro Comparison.0.01%次氯酸作为一种替代性皮肤消毒剂:体外比较
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1489-1493. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001594.
8
Randomized, Prospective Study of the Order of Preoperative Preparation Solutions for Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Surgery.足踝矫形手术患者术前准备溶液使用顺序的随机前瞻性研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 May;37(5):478-82. doi: 10.1177/1071100715623037. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
A comparison of the efficacy of 70% v/v isopropyl alcohol with either 0.5% w/v or 2% w/v chlorhexidine gluconate for skin preparation before harvest of the long saphenous vein used in coronary artery bypass grafting.70%(v/v)异丙醇与0.5%(w/v)或2%(w/v)葡萄糖酸氯己定用于冠状动脉旁路移植术中采集大隐静脉前皮肤准备的疗效比较。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Aug;43(8):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Analyses comparing the antimicrobial activity and safety of current antiseptic agents: a review.当前防腐剂抗菌活性与安全性比较分析:综述
J Infus Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;28(3):194-207. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200505000-00008.