Suppr超能文献

短期和长效β-激动剂对哮喘恶化的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Effects of short- and long-acting beta-agonists on asthma exacerbations: a prospective cohort.

机构信息

Lyon Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER), Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France; Respiratory Medicine, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France; PELyon, Lyon, France.

Kappa Santé, Paris, France.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Mar;124(3):254-260. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.12.012. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In asthma, short- and long-acting β-agonists (SABAs and LABAs) should be used together with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and regular use is inappropriate.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between patterns of use of therapy and asthma exacerbations (AEx).

METHODS

Patients with asthma (6-40 years) were enrolled in France and the United Kingdom. Prescribing data, computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs), and text messages assessed medication use and AEx over a maximum period of 24 months. Generalized linear mixed models provided AEx risks associated with therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 908 patients (median age: 20.0 years, 46.6% women, 24.5% children) answering a total of 4248 CATIs over 486 (±235) days, regular (ie, daily) use was more frequent for single LABAs and fixed dose combinations (FDCs) than for single ICS (75.6%, 70.1%, and 65.4% of investigated periods of use, respectively). Regular (ie, daily or almost daily) SABA use was observed for 21.1% of periods of use. Altogether, 265 patients (29.2%) experienced 1 or more AEx. The ORs for AEx risk related to regular vs no use of FDCs, single ICS, and single LABAs were 0.98 (95% CI = [0.73-1.33]), 0.90 (95% CI = [0.61-1.33]), and 1.29 (95% CI = [0.76-2.17]), respectively, after adjustment for cotherapy, sociodemographic, and disease characteristics. The OR was 2.09 (95% CI = [1.36-3.21]) in regular SABA users.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled corticosteroids and FDCs were often used intermittently, whereas SABAs and LABAs could be used regularly, and exacerbations were frequent. Compared with non-users, the risk of exacerbation increased moderately under regular use of single LABAs, whereas it doubled, significantly, in regular SABA users, likely in relationship with poor overall asthma control.

摘要

背景

在哮喘中,短效和长效β-激动剂(SABA 和 LABA)应与吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)联合使用,常规使用是不合适的。

目的

评估治疗模式与哮喘加重(AEx)之间的关系。

方法

在法国和英国招募哮喘患者(6-40 岁)。通过处方数据、计算机辅助电话访谈(CATIs)和短信评估最大 24 个月内的药物使用情况和 AEx。广义线性混合模型提供了与治疗相关的 AEx 风险。

结果

在 908 名患者(中位年龄:20.0 岁,46.6%女性,24.5%儿童)中,共回答了 4248 次 CATIs,在 486(±235)天内,单 LABA 和固定剂量组合(FDC)的常规(即每日)使用更为频繁(分别为 75.6%、70.1%和 65.4%的使用期)。在使用期内,有 21.1%的时间观察到常规(即每日或几乎每日)使用 SABA。总共,265 名患者(29.2%)经历了 1 次或多次 AEx。与不使用 FDC、单一 ICS 和单一 LABA 的常规使用相比,与 AEx 风险相关的 OR 分别为 0.98(95%CI=[0.73-1.33])、0.90(95%CI=[0.61-1.33])和 1.29(95%CI=[0.76-2.17]),调整了共治疗、社会人口统计学和疾病特征后。在常规 SABA 使用者中,OR 为 2.09(95%CI=[1.36-3.21])。

结论

吸入皮质类固醇和 FDC 经常间歇性使用,而 SABA 和 LABA 可以常规使用,并且加重情况频繁。与非使用者相比,在常规使用单一 LABA 时,加重的风险适度增加,而在常规 SABA 使用者中,风险增加了一倍,这可能与整体哮喘控制不佳有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验