Department of Anesthesiology, Shulan Hospital, No. 848 Dongxin Road, Xiacheng District, Hangzhou 310022, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 318 Chaowang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou 310005, China.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Apr;187:105238. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105238. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
The purpose of our study is to compare the reliability and consistency of three commonly used techniques, which are surface measurement, intracardiac electrocardiogram (IECG) and tracheal bifurcation methods in measuring the tip location of totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) in the same patient.
The thirty-five patients scheduled for implantation of TIVAP were included and right subclavian vein was selected for venous access. We used surface measurement method (Group L) to estimate the length and position of catheter before catheterization, and then we used IECG method (Group E) to confirm the position of catheter during catheterization and after catheterization used tracheal bifurcation method by CT (Group T) for measurement. The differences of catheter length measured by three methods were compared by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the reliability of three methods and Bland-Altman chart was used to evaluate consistency.
There are no difference in the length of TIVAP catheter between L and T groups (P > 0.05), but they have significant differences comparing with E group (P < 0.05). The three positioning methods have a good consistency (ICC = 0.886, P < 0.05).Through linear regression analysis, the regression equation are: catheter length (mm) = 77.32 + 0.66 × height (cm), 36.25 + 0.81 × height (cm) and 68.82 + 0.70 × height (cm). The distances from catheter tip to the junction of superior vena cava and right atrium measured by IECG (Group E) was closer to the target value.
All three methods can be used to measure the length of TIVAP catheter, and IECG method is the most accurate. And similar to most studies, returning the catheter 20 mm after positioning can avoid catheter entering the right atrium, but we found that 10 mm is a sufficient length to achieve this.
本研究旨在比较三种常用技术在同一患者中测量完全植入式静脉输液港(TIVAP)尖端位置的可靠性和一致性,这三种技术分别是体表测量、心内心电图(IECG)和气管分叉法。
纳入 35 例行 TIVAP 植入术的患者,选择右锁骨下静脉进行静脉入路。我们在置管前使用体表测量法(L 组)估计导管的长度和位置,然后在置管过程中使用 IECG 法(E 组)确认导管的位置,置管后使用 CT 下气管分叉法(T 组)进行测量。采用非参数 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较三种方法测量的导管长度差异。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评价三种方法的可靠性,采用 Bland-Altman 图评价一致性。
L 组和 T 组的 TIVAP 导管长度与 E 组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但 L 组和 T 组均明显短于 E 组(P<0.05)。三种定位方法具有良好的一致性(ICC=0.886,P<0.05)。通过线性回归分析,回归方程分别为:导管长度(mm)=77.32+0.66×身高(cm)、36.25+0.81×身高(cm)和 68.82+0.70×身高(cm)。E 组(IECG 组)测量的导管尖端至上腔静脉和右心房交界处的距离更接近目标值。
三种方法均可用于测量 TIVAP 导管的长度,IECG 法最为准确。与大多数研究相似,定位后将导管退回 20mm 可避免导管进入右心房,但我们发现 10mm 就足以达到这一目的。