Suppr超能文献

中心静脉导管的精准放置:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。

Accurate placement of central venous catheters: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

作者信息

McGee W T, Ackerman B L, Rouben L R, Prasad V M, Bandi V, Mallory D L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA 01199.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1993 Aug;21(8):1118-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199308000-00008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

a) To define the frequency of dangerous (intracardiac) central venous catheter placement in a multicenter study of large community hospital intensive care units (ICUs) and to evaluate physician responses to this finding. b) To validate right atrial electrocardiography as a technique to assure adherence with recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines regarding the location of central venous catheter tips. c) To conduct a literature review of vascular cannulation and its associated potentially lethal complications.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter study.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary ICUs in five large community teaching hospitals.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients (n = 112) who required a central venous catheter by either internal jugular vein or subclavian vein at four separate hospitals were assessed using 30-cm catheters. Consecutive patients (n = 50) in a fifth hospital who subsequently required a central venous catheter via the internal jugular vein or subclavian vein route were prospectively randomized to receive a 20-cm central venous catheter with either conventional surface-landmark guidance, or with the right atrial electrocardiography-guided technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

a) Occurrence rate of malpositioned central venous catheters. b) Ability of right atrial electrocardiography to aid in the accurate placement of central venous catheters.

RESULTS

a) Using conventional placement techniques with a 30-cm catheter, 53 (47%) of 112 initial central venous catheter placements resulted in location of the catheter tip within the heart. Catheter tips were not repositioned to locations outside the right atrium after this finding was identified on initial post-procedure films. b) Using the right atrial electrocardiography technique to place 20-cm central venous catheters resulted in no catheter tip locations within the heart (0/25) vs. 14 (56%) of 25 (p < .0001) intracardiac placements using conventional techniques. c) The literature suggests that serious mechanical complications of central venous catheterization, although uncommon, are associated with a high mortality rate. Deaths are associated with intracardiac placement.

CONCLUSIONS

a) The FDA guidelines regarding catheter tip location (catheter tip should not be in the right atrium) have not been widely publicized. b) The average safe insertion depth for a central venous catheter from the left or right internal jugular vein or subclavian vein is 16.5 cm for the majority of adult patients; a central venous catheter should not be routinely inserted to a depth of > 20 cm. Catheters longer than this size are rarely needed, and potentially dangerous. Catheter tip location is important to document following central venous catheter insertion. Thirty-centimeter central venous catheters should not be used when accessing the central circulation via internal jugular or subclavian veins. c) Right atrial electrocardiography is a technique that assures initial tip position outside the heart in accordance with FDA guidelines. This technique would virtually eliminate the major risk of death (i.e., cardiac perforation) associated with this procedure. d) Recently available, 15- and 16-cm central venous catheters have significant potential to minimize intracardiac placement of central venous catheters by either the internal jugular or subclavian vein route and may become the standard of care.

摘要

目的

a)在大型社区医院重症监护病房(ICU)的多中心研究中确定危险(心内)中心静脉导管置入的频率,并评估医生对这一发现的反应。b)验证右房心电图作为一种确保符合美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于中心静脉导管尖端位置最新指南的技术。c)对血管插管及其相关的潜在致命并发症进行文献综述。

设计

前瞻性、随机、盲法、多中心研究。

地点

五家大型社区教学医院的多学科ICU。

患者

在四家不同医院通过颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉需要中心静脉导管的连续患者(n = 112)使用30厘米导管进行评估。第五家医院随后需要通过颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉途径置入中心静脉导管的连续患者(n = 50)被前瞻性随机分组,分别接受采用传统体表标志引导或右房心电图引导技术的20厘米中心静脉导管。

主要观察指标

a)中心静脉导管位置不当的发生率。b)右房心电图辅助中心静脉导管准确置入的能力。

结果

a)使用30厘米导管的传统置入技术,112例初始中心静脉导管置入中有53例(47%)导管尖端位于心脏内。在术后初始X线片上发现这一情况后,导管尖端未重新定位到右心房以外的位置。b)使用右房心电图技术置入20厘米中心静脉导管,心脏内未出现导管尖端位置(0/25),而采用传统技术时25例中有14例(56%)导管尖端位于心脏内(p < .0001)。c)文献表明,中心静脉置管的严重机械并发症虽然不常见,但死亡率很高。死亡与心内放置有关。

结论

a)FDA关于导管尖端位置的指南(导管尖端不应位于右心房)尚未广泛宣传。b)对于大多数成年患者,从左或右颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉置入中心静脉导管的平均安全插入深度为16.5厘米;中心静脉导管不应常规插入深度> 20厘米。超过此尺寸的导管很少需要,且有潜在危险。中心静脉导管插入后记录导管尖端位置很重要。通过颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉进入中心循环时不应使用30厘米的中心静脉导管。c)右房心电图是一种确保初始尖端位置符合FDA指南位于心脏外的技术。该技术几乎可以消除与该操作相关的主要死亡风险(即心脏穿孔)。d)最近可用的15厘米和16厘米中心静脉导管有很大潜力将通过颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉途径置入中心静脉导管时的心内放置风险降至最低,并可能成为护理标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验