Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Missouri S&T, Missouri, USA.
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 20;9(1):19591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55823-2.
Concerns about the effects of global warming provide a strong case to consider how best nuclear power could be applied to marine propulsion. Currently, there are persistent efforts worldwide to combat global warming, and that also includes the commercial freight shipping sector. In an effort to decarbonize the marine sector, there are growing interests in replacing the contemporary, traditional propulsion systems with nuclear propulsion systems. The latter system allows freight ships to have longer intervals before refueling; subsequently, lower fuel costs, and minimal carbon emissions. Nonetheless, nuclear propulsion systems have remained largely confined to military vessels. It is highly desirable that a civil marine core not use soluble boron for reactivity control, but it is then a challenge to achieve an adequate shutdown margin throughout the core life while maintaining reactivity control and acceptable power distributions in the core. High-thickness ZrB 150 μm Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) is an excellent burnable poison (BP) candidate for long life soluble-boron-free core. However, in this study, we want to minimize the use of 150 μm IFBA since B-10 undergoes an (n, α) capture reaction, and the resulting helium raises the pressure within the plenum and in the cladding. Therefore, we have considered several alternative and novel burnable BP design strategies to minimize the use of IFBA for reactivity control in this study: (Case 1) a composite BP: gadolinia (GdO) or erbia (ErO) with 150 μm thickness ZrB IFBA; (Case 2) Pu-240 or Am-241 mixed homogeneously with the fuel; and (Case 3) another composite BP: Pu-240 or Am-241 with 150 μm thickness ZrB IFBA. The results are compared against those for a high-thickness 150 μm 25 IFBA pins design from a previous study. The high-thickness 150 μm 25 IFBA pins design is termed the "IFBA-only" BP design throughout this study. We arrive at a design using 15% U-235 fuel loaded into 13 × 13 assemblies with Case 3 BPs (IFBA+Pu-240 or IFBA+Am-241) for reactivity control while reducing 20% IFBA use. This design exhibits lower assembly reactivity swing and minimal burnup penalty due to the self-shielding effect. Case 3 provides ~10% more initial (beginning-of-life) reactivity suppression with ~70% less reactivity swing compared to the IFBA-only design for UO fuel while achieving almost the same core lifetime. Finally, optimized Case 3 assemblies were loaded in 3D nodal diffusion and reactor model code. The results obtained from the 3D reactor model confirmed that the designed core with the proposed Case 3 BPs can achieve the target lifetime of 15 years while contributing to ~10% higher BOL reactivity suppression, ~70% lower reactivity swings, ~30% lower radial form factor and ~28% lower total peaking factor compared to the IFBA-only core.
人们对全球变暖影响的担忧强烈地促使人们考虑如何最好地将核电应用于船舶推进。目前,全球范围内正在持续努力应对全球变暖问题,这也包括商业货运航运部门。为了使海洋部门脱碳,人们越来越感兴趣用核推进系统取代当代传统推进系统。后一种系统允许货船在加油前有更长的间隔时间;随后,燃料成本更低,碳排放更少。尽管如此,核推进系统在很大程度上仍然局限于军用船只。民用船舶的核心非常希望不使用可溶性硼进行反应性控制,但随后的挑战是在整个核心寿命内实现足够的停堆裕度,同时保持核心的反应性控制和可接受的功率分布。高厚度 150μm 的 ZrB150μm 整体燃料可燃毒物(IFBA)是长寿命无可溶性硼核心的极好可燃毒物(BP)候选物。然而,在这项研究中,我们希望尽量减少 150μmIFBA 的使用,因为硼-10 会发生(n,α)俘获反应,产生的氦气会增加舱内和包壳内的压力。因此,我们考虑了几种替代和新颖的可燃 BP 设计策略,以在这项研究中尽量减少 IFBA 对反应性控制的使用:(案例 1)复合 BP:钆(GdO)或铒(ErO)与 150μm 厚的 ZrB IFBA;(案例 2)Pu-240 或 Am-241 与燃料均匀混合;和(案例 3)另一种复合 BP:Pu-240 或 Am-241 与 150μm 厚的 ZrB IFBA。结果与之前研究中高厚度 150μm25IFBA 销设计的结果进行了比较。高厚度 150μm25IFBA 销设计在整个研究中被称为“仅 IFBA”BP 设计。我们采用了一种设计,使用 15%的 U-235 燃料装入 13×13 个组件,使用案例 3BP(IFBA+Pu-240 或 IFBA+Am-241)进行反应性控制,同时减少 20%的 IFBA 使用。与仅 IFBA 设计相比,该设计具有更低的组件反应性摆动和最小的燃耗惩罚,因为存在自屏蔽效应。案例 3 为 UO 燃料提供了约 10%的初始(起始寿命)反应性抑制,与 IFBA 相比,反应性摆动降低了约 70%,而几乎相同的核心寿命。最后,对优化后的案例 3 组件进行了 3D 节点扩散和反应堆模型代码的装载。从 3D 反应堆模型中获得的结果证实,设计的具有提议的案例 3BP 的核心可以实现 15 年的目标寿命,同时与仅 IFBA 核心相比,贡献了约 10%更高的 BOL 反应性抑制、约 70%更低的反应性摆动、约 30%更低的径向形状因子和约 28%更低的总峰值因子。