Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hospital de Baza, Granada, Spain.
Academic Health System, Medical School, Hamad Medical Corporation, Translational Research Institute, Doha, Qatar.
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Jan;33(1):e13203. doi: 10.1111/dth.13203. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Rosacea is a chronic dermatosis which affects negatively patients' quality of life (QoL). There is shortage of high-quality evidence comparing the efficacy of ivermectin cream (IVM) 1% with other available topical choices. Besides, the well-documented impaired of self-esteem and stigmatization of rosacea patients make essential to address which treatment provides the greatest psychological and social benefit. Our objective is to critically review and appraise the efficacy of IVM 1% in PPR and the impact in patients' QoL against other options. We carried out a literature search from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov using the following descriptors: "rosacea" AND "ivermectin." Efficacy was assessed with the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and the impact on QoL was based on the DLQI score. Six studies from four published articles were included. The meta-analysis estimated that more participants achieved "success" (IGA ≤ 1) and "complete clearance" (IGA = 0) with IVM1%. The overall effect estimate for IGA ≤ 1 was: 1.56 [1.23-1.97], whereas for IGA = 0, it was: 1.72 [1.40-2.11]. The rate of participants achieving lower DLQI score, and thus, better QoL was with IVM 1%. The overall effect estimate was: 1.71 [1.34-2.18] at week 16# and 1.64 [1.38-1.94] at week 52#. This meta-analysis confirms IVM 1% cream as the most effective topical treatment and it satisfies the impairment of social life with sustained better QoL. Further studies extending this period of remission are warranted, as well as researches about the potential application of this agent combined with other agents. KEY POINTS: Question: What is the current efficacy of ivermectin versus other choices in papulopustular rosacea and its impact on patients' quality of life? Findings: In this meta-analysis, ivermectin showed higher efficacy than metronidazol, azelaic acid, and placebo measured by Investigator Global Assessment. Parallely, the DLQI score highlighted that this agent was more beneficious in both short and long-term. Meaning: This meta-analysis gives strong evidence that ivermectin is the most effective topical treatment. Besides, this agent provides the greatest psychological benefit as it satisfies the stigmatization of rosacea patients as well as the impairment of social and working life with a sustained better QoL above other alternatives.
酒渣鼻是一种慢性皮肤病,会对患者的生活质量(QoL)产生负面影响。目前缺乏高质量的证据来比较伊维菌素乳膏(IVM)1%与其他可用的局部治疗选择的疗效。此外,酒渣鼻患者自尊心受损和受到污名化的情况严重,因此有必要确定哪种治疗方法能带来最大的心理和社会获益。我们的目标是批判性地回顾和评估 IVM 1%在 PPR 中的疗效以及对患者生活质量的影响,并将其与其他选择进行比较。我们在 PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 和 clinicaltrials.gov 上使用以下描述符进行了文献检索:“rosacea”和“ivermectin”。使用研究者全球评估(IGA)评估疗效,使用皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评分评估对生活质量的影响。从四篇已发表的文章中纳入了六项研究。荟萃分析估计,更多的参与者使用 IVM1%实现了“成功”(IGA≤1)和“完全清除”(IGA=0)。IGA≤1 的总体效应估计值为:1.56[1.23-1.97],而 IGA=0 的总体效应估计值为:1.72[1.40-2.11]。参与者获得较低的 DLQI 评分,从而改善生活质量的比例为 IVM 1%。16 周时的总体效应估计值为:1.71[1.34-2.18],52 周时的总体效应估计值为:1.64[1.38-1.94]。这项荟萃分析证实 IVM 1%乳膏是最有效的局部治疗方法,它满足了社交生活受损的需求,并维持了更好的生活质量。需要进一步的研究来延长这种缓解期,还需要研究这种药物与其他药物联合应用的潜在应用。主要观点:问题:在脓疱性酒渣鼻中,伊维菌素与其他选择相比的当前疗效及其对患者生活质量的影响是什么?发现:在这项荟萃分析中,与甲硝唑、壬二酸和安慰剂相比,伊维菌素在研究者全球评估中显示出更高的疗效。同时,皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评分突出表明,这种药物在短期和长期内都更有益。意义:这项荟萃分析提供了强有力的证据,证明伊维菌素是最有效的局部治疗方法。此外,这种药物提供了最大的心理获益,因为它满足了酒渣鼻患者的污名化需求,以及社交和工作生活的受损需求,从而维持了比其他替代药物更好的生活质量。