School of Environment and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, 214122, PR China.
Singapore Membrane Technology Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 637141, Singapore.
Chemosphere. 2020 Apr;245:125569. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125569. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
This study compared the performance of an anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor (AFMBR)-zeolite adsorption-reverse osmosis (RO) system and an anoxic-aerobic MBR-RO system for municipal wastewater reclamation. Both MBR-RO systems were operated in parallel with the same operating conditions. The results showed that the MBR systems achieved excellent organic removals (>95%) and the anoxic-aerobic MBR could also remove ∼57% of soluble total nitrogen. Compared to the aerobic MBR, the AFMBR displayed better membrane performance with less energy consumption, attributed to effective membrane scouring by liquid-fluidized GAC particles. Furthermore, a zeolite column was employed to remove ammonia in the AFMBR permeate, which ensured comparable organic and nitrogen levels in the feeds to RO units in the two processes. Although less organic substances and microbial cells were accumulated on the RO membrane fed with AFMBR-zeolite column effluent, its fouling rate (∼6.5 ± 2.2 bar/day) was significantly greater than that fed with anoxic-aerobic MBR permeate (∼1.1 ± 1.5 bar/day). This may be associated with more severe inorganic colloidal fouling on the RO membrane, illustrated by an electrical impedance spectroscopy fouling monitoring system.
本研究比较了厌氧流化床膜生物反应器(AFMBR)-沸石吸附-反渗透(RO)系统和缺氧-好氧 MBR-RO 系统用于城市污水再生的性能。这两个 MBR-RO 系统在相同的操作条件下平行运行。结果表明,MBR 系统实现了优异的有机物去除(>95%),缺氧-好氧 MBR 还可以去除约 57%的可溶性总氮。与好氧 MBR 相比,AFMBR 通过液体流化 GAC 颗粒有效冲刷膜,显示出更好的膜性能和更少的能耗。此外,沸石柱用于去除 AFMBR 渗滤液中的氨,这确保了两种工艺中 RO 装置进料中具有可比的有机物和氮水平。尽管用 AFMBR-沸石柱出水作为进料的 RO 膜上积累的有机物和微生物细胞较少,但它的污染速率(约 6.5±2.2 巴/天)明显高于用缺氧-好氧 MBR 渗滤液作为进料的 RO 膜(约 1.1±1.5 巴/天)。这可能与 RO 膜上更严重的无机胶体污染有关,电阻抗谱污染监测系统对此进行了说明。