Suppr超能文献

消融指数指导接触力消融治疗心房颤动:与冷冻球囊消融的配对调整间接比较。

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation Using Ablation Index-Guided Contact Force Ablation: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison to Cryoballoon Ablation.

机构信息

St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):785-799. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01173-4. Epub 2019 Dec 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ablation Index, also known as VISITAG SURPOINT™, is a novel lesion-quality marker that improves outcomes in radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). There is no direct evidence on the comparative effectiveness of RF ablation with Ablation Index and cryoballoon (CB). The objective of the present study was to conduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using individual patient-level data (IPD) to compare the effectiveness of RF ablation with Ablation Index to that of CB on recurrence of atrial arrhythmias 12 months after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF).

METHODS

Individual patient-level data for RF ablation with Ablation Index were obtained from two studies: Solimene et al. [J Interv Card Electrophysiol 54(1):9-15, 2019] and Hussein et al. [J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28(9):1037-1047, 2017]. Comparable CB studies identified from a systematic literature review were pooled. Prognostic variables for adjustment were ranked a priori by several practicing electrophysiologists. In the absence of a common treatment arm between the Ablation Index and CB studies, an unanchored MAIC was conducted. Primary analysis compared the Solimene et al. study to pooled CB studies. A secondary analysis compared pooled RF ablation with Ablation Index studies to pooled CB studies. Several scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Primary analyses showed statistically significant reductions in the rate of arrhythmia recurrence with RF ablation with Ablation Index compared to CB in unmatched, unadjusted (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.95) and matched (0.42, 0.21-0.86) analyses. Greater reductions in the rate of arrhythmia recurrence that favored RF ablation with Ablation Index were observed after matching and adjusting for age (0.41, 0.20-0.85), age and left ventricular ejection fraction (0.37, 0.16-0.88), and age, sex, and left ventricular ejection fraction (0.30, 0.13-0.71). Secondary and sensitivity analyses showed similar reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation with Ablation Index was associated with reductions in recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months compared to CB in unmatched and unadjusted, matched, and matched and adjusted comparisons.

摘要

简介

消融指数,也称为 VISITAG SURPOINT™,是一种新型的病变质量标志物,可改善射频 (RF) 导管消融治疗心房颤动 (AF) 的效果。目前尚无关于 RF 消融联合消融指数与冷冻球囊 (CB) 在房颤导管消融后 12 个月复发性房性心律失常方面的比较有效性的直接证据。本研究的目的是使用个体患者水平数据 (IPD) 进行匹配调整间接比较 (MAIC),以比较 RF 消融联合消融指数与 CB 在阵发性 AF (PAF) 患者导管消融后 12 个月时房性心律失常复发方面的有效性。

方法

从两项研究中获得了 RF 消融联合消融指数的个体患者水平数据:Solimene 等人 [J Interv Card Electrophysiol 54(1):9-15, 2019] 和 Hussein 等人 [J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28(9):1037-1047, 2017]。从系统文献回顾中确定了可比的 CB 研究,并将其进行了汇总。由几位执业电生理学家预先对预后变量进行了排序,以进行调整。由于 Ablation Index 和 CB 研究之间没有共同的治疗组,因此进行了无锚定的 MAIC。主要分析将 Solimene 等人的研究与汇总的 CB 研究进行了比较。二次分析将汇总的 RF 消融联合消融指数研究与汇总的 CB 研究进行了比较。进行了几种方案和敏感性分析。

结果

主要分析显示,与 CB 相比,RF 消融联合消融指数可显著降低心律失常的复发率,在未匹配、未调整 (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.27-0.95) 和匹配 (0.42, 0.21-0.86) 分析中均如此。在匹配和调整年龄 (0.41, 0.20-0.85)、年龄和左心室射血分数 (0.37, 0.16-0.88) 以及年龄、性别和左心室射血分数 (0.30, 0.13-0.71) 后,观察到对心律失常复发率的更大降低,这更有利于 RF 消融联合消融指数。二次和敏感性分析显示出相似的降低。

结论

与 CB 相比,在未匹配和未调整、匹配和调整的比较中,RF 消融联合消融指数与心房性心律失常在 12 个月时的复发率降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02c5/7004430/f72a29ca958c/12325_2019_1173_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验