Suppr超能文献

新型全覆膜放射性支架治疗晚期食管癌和贲门癌的疗效:一项回顾性对照研究

[Efficacy of a novel fully covered radioactive stent for advanced esophageal and gastric cardia cancer: a retrospective controlled study].

作者信息

Wang C, Zhu G Y, Lu J, Chen L, Wang Y, Li J C, Li T K, Guo J H

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 17;99(47):3687-3693. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.47.003.

Abstract

To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel fully covered radioactive stent for the treatment of advanced esophageal and gastric cardia cancer. Data of 122 patients, who underwent esophageal radioactive stent placement for advanced esophageal or gastric cardia cancer between January 2012 and September 2017 in Zhongda Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the novel stent group (59; 45 males, 14 females; mean age 73±10 years old) and the conventional stent group (63; 51 males, 12 females; mean age 72±9 years old), according to the types of radioactive stents. No significant difference was found between the two groups in baseline characteristics (all 0.05). Outcomes were measured in terms of technical success, dysphagia score, stent restenosis, stent migration, major complications, and overall survival. The technical success rate was 98.3% in the novel stent group, and 100.0% in the conventional stent group (0.484) . The dysphagia scores 3 days after surgery decreased from 3.27±0.45 and 3.37±0.49 to 1.25±0.66 and 1.32±0.50, respectively (all 0.01), and the variances were comparable (0.709). Compared with conventional stents, novel stents were significantly associated with a decreased in the rate of stent restenosis, 11.9% vs 27.0%; cause-specific hazard ratio 0.387, 95 0.160-0.934 (0.035); sub-distributional hazard ratio 0.401, 95 0.167-0.963 (0.041), while the stent migration rate was statistically comparable (13.6% vs 6.3%, 0.181). There was no significant difference between the novel stent group and the conventional stent group in major complications (all 0.05), including moderate-severe chest pain (22.0% vs 25.4%), hemorrhage (11.9% vs 11.1%), fistula formation (1.7% vs 4.8%), and aspiration pneumonia (5.1% vs 6.3%). The median overall survival was 146(95 115-177) days in the novel stent group, and 147(95 98-196) days in the conventional stent group, and no significant difference was found (0.967). In patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cardia cancer,placement of a novel fully covered radioactive stent is safe and effective. This novel stent can relieve dysphagia rapidly and prevent stent restenosis effectively.

摘要

评估一种新型全覆膜放射性支架治疗晚期食管癌和贲门癌的可行性、安全性及疗效。回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年9月在中大医院接受食管放射性支架置入术治疗晚期食管癌或贲门癌的122例患者的数据。根据放射性支架类型,将患者分为新型支架组(59例;男性45例,女性14例;平均年龄73±10岁)和传统支架组(63例;男性51例,女性12例;平均年龄72±9岁)。两组基线特征无显著差异(均P>0.05)。观察指标包括技术成功率、吞咽困难评分、支架再狭窄、支架移位、主要并发症及总生存期。新型支架组技术成功率为98.3%,传统支架组为100.0%(P = 0.484)。术后3天吞咽困难评分分别从3.27±0.45和3.37±0.49降至1.25±0.66和1.32±0.50(均P<0.01),且差异具有可比性(P = 0.709)。与传统支架相比,新型支架显著降低了支架再狭窄率,分别为11.9%和27.0%;病因特异性风险比为0.387,95%置信区间为0.160 - 0.934(P = 0.035);亚分布风险比为0.401,95%置信区间为0.167 - 0.963(P = 0.041),而支架移位率在统计学上无差异(13.6%对6.3%,P = 0.181)。新型支架组和传统支架组在主要并发症方面无显著差异(均P>0.05),包括中重度胸痛(22.0%对25.4%)、出血(11.9%对11.1%)、瘘管形成(1.7%对4.8%)和吸入性肺炎(5.1%对6.3%)。新型支架组中位总生存期为146(95%置信区间115 - 177)天,传统支架组为147(95%置信区间98 - 196)天,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.967)。对于晚期食管癌或贲门癌患者,置入新型全覆膜放射性支架是安全有效的。这种新型支架能迅速缓解吞咽困难并有效预防支架再狭窄。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验