• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全腹腔镜和全机器人手术治疗左侧结肠憩室炎患者。

Totally laparoscopic and totally robotic surgery in patients with left-sided colonic diverticulitis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2020 Feb;16(1):e2068. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2068. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2068
PMID:31875352
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Introduction of the da Vinci Xi system has facilitated the use of robotics in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, data on the outcomes of robotic surgery for the treatment of colonic diverticulitis have remained scarce.

METHODS

Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and perioperative outcomes of the patients undergoing totally robotic with the da Vinci Xi system or laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colonic diverticulitis (LCD) were compared.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic and robotic groups included 22 and 20 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, operative time, and postoperative complications. There were three conversions in the laparoscopy group and no conversion in the robotic group (P = 0.23). Conversion to open surgery was associated with postoperative morbidity (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery is an applicable alternative for the treatment of LCD. Robotic approach may potentially lower the risk of operative morbidity by reducing the requirement of conversion.

摘要

背景

达芬奇 Xi 系统的引入促进了机器人技术在结直肠手术中的应用。然而,关于机器人手术治疗结肠憩室炎的结果的数据仍然很少。

方法

比较了接受达芬奇 Xi 系统全机器人手术和腹腔镜手术治疗左侧结肠憩室炎(LCD)的患者的人口统计学、临床特征和围手术期结果。

结果

腹腔镜组和机器人组分别包括 22 例和 20 例患者。两组患者的人口统计学、临床特征、手术时间和术后并发症无显著差异。腹腔镜组有 3 例中转开腹,机器人组无中转开腹(P=0.23)。中转开腹与术后发病率相关(P=0.02)。

结论

机器人手术是治疗 LCD 的一种可行选择。机器人方法通过减少中转开腹的需求,可能降低手术发病率的风险。

相似文献

1
Totally laparoscopic and totally robotic surgery in patients with left-sided colonic diverticulitis.全腹腔镜和全机器人手术治疗左侧结肠憩室炎患者。
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Feb;16(1):e2068. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2068. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection for Diverticular Disease: A Single-Center Experience of 106 Cases.机器人手术与腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病:单中心106例经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Nov;29(11):1451-1455. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0451. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
3
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.开腹、腹腔镜及机器人辅助全腹结肠切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2792-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4552-8. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
Surgical resection for diverticulitis using robotic natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal extraction approach: the NICE procedure.使用机器人经自然腔道体内吻合术和经直肠取出法进行憩室炎手术切除:NICE手术
J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):517-523. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01022-0. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
Robotic pelvic dissection as surgical treatment of complicated diverticulitis in elective settings: a comparative study with fully laparoscopic procedure.机器人盆腔解剖作为择期手术治疗复杂憩室炎的方法:与完全腹腔镜手术的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2583-2590. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6553-x. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.了解在结直肠手术中,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术和机器人手术方法的价值。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):850-856. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0620. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
7
From Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Extracorporeal Anastomosis to Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Anastomosis to Totally Robotic Right Colectomy for Cancer: The Evolution of Robotic Multiquadrant Abdominal Surgery.从腹腔镜右半结肠切除术加体外吻合术到机器人辅助体内吻合术再到全机器人右半结肠切除术治疗癌症:机器人多象限腹部手术的演变
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1216-1222. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0693. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
Laparoscopic vs. robotic colectomy for left-sided diverticulitis.腹腔镜与机器人左半结肠切除术治疗憩室炎。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2823-2830. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01719-3. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis with fistula.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗伴有瘘管的乙状结肠憩室炎的比较
J Robot Surg. 2015 Jun;9(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0503-6. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
10
The da Vinci Xi system for robotic total/subtotal colectomy vs. conventional laparoscopy: short-term outcomes.达芬奇 Xi 系统机器人全结肠/次全结肠切除术与传统腹腔镜术:短期结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02066-y. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Left colectomy for diverticular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic resections.针对憩室病的左半结肠切除术:比较机器人手术与腹腔镜手术切除的系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 May 25;29(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03155-x.
2
Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis.我们是否应该鼓励在复杂性憩室炎中使用机器人技术?系统评价和荟萃分析结果。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Sep 13;10:1208611. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611. eCollection 2023.
3
A retrospective comparison of 90-day outcomes, length of stay, and readmissions between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic colectomy.
机器人辅助结肠切除术与腹腔镜结肠切除术90天结局、住院时间和再入院情况的回顾性比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2205-2209. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01642-7. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
4
Structured training curricula for robotic colorectal surgery in China: does laparoscopic experience affect training effects?中国机器人结直肠手术的结构化培训课程:腹腔镜经验会影响培训效果吗?
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Feb 28;14(1):198-205. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-1193.
5
The success rate of robotic natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE procedure) in a large cohort of consecutive unselected patients.在一大群连续未经选择的患者中,机器人自然腔道体内吻合和经直肠提取(NICE 手术)的成功率。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):683-691. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09717-6. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜左半结肠切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;37(7):1497-1507. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04194-8. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人内脏手术在粘连患者中的作用:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 18;12(2):307. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020307.
8
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies: intra- and postoperative outcomes of 683 patients.腹腔镜与机器人辅助左半结肠切除术:683 例患者的围手术期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6235-6242. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-09003-x. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Predictors and Consequences of Unplanned Conversion to Open During Robotic Colectomy: An ACS-NSQIP Database Analysis.机器人结直肠切除术中计划外中转开腹的预测因素和后果:ACS-NSQIP 数据库分析。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2021 Nov;80(11 Suppl 3):3-9.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience.机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年患者恢复时间方面的比较:一项单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):981-987. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01332-2. Epub 2021 Nov 7.