Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.036. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
To develop a set of composite scores that can be used for interpreting quality of life (QOL) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) using 9 of the patient-reported outcomes measures from the Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) measurement system.
Participants completed 20 item banks from the TBI-QOL as part of a larger assessment. Composite index scores were created with normalized transformation with nonlinear area conversion using scores from 9 of the banks, and are expressed in index score units, with higher composite scores indicating better functioning. For descriptive purposes, associations among composites and individual banks were evaluated using regression, along with patterns of composite scores by injury severity groups using analysis of variance.
Three medical centers in the United States.
Community-dwelling adults (n=504) with a history of TBI.
Not applicable.
TBI-QOL.
Five composite indices were generated: global QOL, physical health, emotional health, cognitive health, and social health. Lookup tables are provided herein. Composite scores were highly intercorrelated (all r>.60, P<.0001), and individual TBI-QOL banks all correlate strongly with the global QOL composite in the expected direction (all r>.50, P<.0001).
Researchers and clinicians can use the TBI-QOL global QOL, physical health, emotional health, cognitive health, and social health composite scores to aggregate results from multiple TBI-QOL banks, which is anticipated to ease interpretation and reliability. This work additionally highlights the importance of considering nonphysical symptoms as outcomes variables for TBI research, as cognitive, social, and emotional domains were some of the most strongly correlated banks with the global QOL composite.
利用创伤性脑损伤(TBI)生活质量(QOL)测量系统中的 9 个患者报告结局测量工具,开发一套综合评分,用于解释 TBI 后的 QOL。
参与者完成了 TBI-QOL 的 20 个项目库,作为更大评估的一部分。使用 9 个库中的分数,通过标准化转换和非线性区域转换创建综合指标评分,以指数评分单位表示,得分越高表示功能越好。为了描述性目的,使用回归评估了综合指标和各个库之间的关联,以及使用方差分析评估了损伤严重程度组的综合评分模式。
美国的 3 个医疗中心。
有 TBI 病史的社区居住成年人(n=504)。
不适用。
TBI-QOL。
生成了 5 个综合指标:整体 QOL、身体健康、情绪健康、认知健康和社会健康。本文提供了查找表。综合评分高度相关(所有 r>.60,P<.0001),TBI-QOL 各个库与全球 QOL 综合评分的相关性均很强(所有 r>.50,P<.0001),方向符合预期。
研究人员和临床医生可以使用 TBI-QOL 的全球 QOL、身体健康、情绪健康、认知健康和社会健康综合评分来汇总多个 TBI-QOL 库的结果,预计这将简化解释和可靠性。这项工作还强调了将认知、社会和情感领域等非身体症状作为 TBI 研究的结果变量的重要性,因为这些领域是与全球 QOL 综合评分相关性最强的库之一。