• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性爆震性肺损伤:英国军队的经验。

Primary Blast Lung Injury: The UK Military Experience.

机构信息

Academic Department of Military Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, ICT Centre, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.

Department of Anaesthesia, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP UK.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2020 Jun 8;185(5-6):e568-e572. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz453.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usz453
PMID:31875895
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Primary blast lung injury occurs when an explosive shock wave passes through the thorax and transits through tissues of varying densities. It requires close proximity to an explosion and presents quick with respiratory distress in survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Joint Theatre Trauma Registry and the Defence Statistics (Health) Database were interrogated for casualties injured as a result of an explosion during the conflict in Afghanistan. The case notes and imaging of casualties meeting the criteria for diagnosis were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data on casualties with primary blast lung injury were analyzed.

RESULTS

848 blast-exposed casualties survived to discharge from intensive care, and 238 blast-exposed casualties were killed in action. Following exclusions, 111 case notes and all postmortem reports were reviewed in detail. About, 25 casualties had isolated primary blast lung injury (2.9% of casualties surviving to discharge from intensive care) and 31 nonsurvivors (13% of nonsurvivors) had the disease documented at postmortem. Severe cases of primary blast lung injury required an estimated average of 4.5 days of conventional mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

8.1% of blast exposed casualties suffered primary blast lung injury. It was a less severe disease than other nontraumatic forms of acute lung injury and did not cause deaths once a casualty had reached a combat support hospital. It was well managed with a relatively brief period of conventional mechanical ventilation.

摘要

简介

原发性爆震性肺损伤发生在爆炸冲击波穿过胸部并穿过密度不同的组织时。它需要靠近爆炸源,并在幸存者中迅速出现呼吸窘迫。

材料和方法

联合战区创伤登记处和国防统计(健康)数据库被询问了在阿富汗冲突中因爆炸而受伤的人员。审查了符合诊断标准的伤员的病历记录和影像学资料。分析了原发性爆震性肺损伤伤员的人口统计学和临床数据。

结果

848 名爆震暴露伤员从重症监护中存活并出院,238 名爆震暴露伤员在行动中死亡。排除后,详细审查了 111 份病历记录和所有尸检报告。约有 25 名伤员患有孤立性原发性爆震性肺损伤(从重症监护中存活并出院的伤员的 2.9%),31 名非幸存者(非幸存者的 13%)在尸检时记录了该病。严重的原发性爆震性肺损伤需要大约 4.5 天的常规机械通气。

结论

8.1%的爆震暴露伤员患有原发性爆震性肺损伤。与其他非创伤性急性肺损伤形式相比,该病的严重程度较轻,一旦伤员到达战斗支援医院,就不会导致死亡。通过相对较短的常规机械通气治疗,可以很好地控制该病。

相似文献

1
Primary Blast Lung Injury: The UK Military Experience.原发性爆震性肺损伤:英国军队的经验。
Mil Med. 2020 Jun 8;185(5-6):e568-e572. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz453.
2
The epidemiology of blast lung injury during recent military conflicts: a retrospective database review of cases presenting to deployed military hospitals, 2003-2009.爆炸肺损伤在近期军事冲突中的流行病学:2003-2009 年部署军事医院收治病例的回顾性数据库研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 27;366(1562):291-4. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0251.
3
The surgical management of facial trauma in British soldiers during combat operations in Afghanistan.阿富汗作战行动期间英国士兵面部创伤的外科治疗
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
Primary blast lung injury prevalence and fatal injuries from explosions: insights from postmortem computed tomographic analysis of 121 improvised explosive device fatalities.原发性爆炸伤性肺损伤的患病率和爆炸所致致命伤:121 例简易爆炸装置致死者的尸体 CT 分析的见解。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Aug;75(2 Suppl 2):S269-74. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318299d93e.
5
Primary blast lung injury at a NATO Role 3 hospital.北约三级医院的原发性肺爆震伤。
J R Army Med Corps. 2014 Jun;160(2):161-6. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2013-000216. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
6
The burden of gunshot wounding of UK military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2003-14.2003年至2014年期间英国军事人员在伊拉克和阿富汗遭受枪伤的负担。
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1064-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
Extremity injuries sustained by the UK military in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts: 2003-2014.2003年至2014年英国军队在伊拉克和阿富汗冲突中遭受的肢体损伤
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1439-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 17.
8
Injuries from roadside improvised explosive devices.路边简易爆炸装置造成的伤害。
J Trauma. 2008 Oct;65(4):910-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181848cf6.
9
Pelvic injury patterns in blast: Morbidity and mortality.爆炸导致的骨盆损伤模式:发病率和死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):832-838. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002659.
10
Learning the lessons from conflict: pre-hospital cervical spine stabilisation following ballistic neck trauma.从冲突中吸取教训:弹道性颈部创伤后的院前颈椎稳定。
Injury. 2009 Dec;40(12):1342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.06.168. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment model of blast injury: A narrative review.爆炸伤评估模型:一篇综述。
iScience. 2025 Jun 6;28(7):112830. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112830. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.
2
CT radiomics to assess severity of explosion-induced primary blast lung injury in goats.利用CT影像组学评估山羊爆炸所致原发性冲击伤性肺损伤的严重程度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 2;15(1):19280. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03069-6.
3
Evaluation of the effects of explosions: A ten-year retrospective study.爆炸影响的评估:一项十年回顾性研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Mar;31(3):233-241. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.40088.
4
Evaluating the effectiveness of handheld ultrasound in primary blast lung injury: a comprehensive study.评估手持式超声在原发性爆震性肺损伤中的有效性:一项综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 18;15(1):2358. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86928-6.
5
Combat Trauma-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Scoping Review.对抗创伤相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项范围综述
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Sep 14;4(9):e0759. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000759. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Management of primary blast lung injury: a comparison of airway pressure release versus low tidal volume ventilation.原发性爆震性肺损伤的管理:气道压力释放通气与低潮气量通气的比较
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Jun 23;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00314-2.