Department of Urology, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, Facultat de Medicina i Odontologia, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
J Endourol. 2020 Feb;34(2):227-232. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0655. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
To determine possible risk factors for accidental nephrostomy tube dislodgement and compare two different tube types in this context in patients with chronic catheters. We conducted a retrospective study of long-term patients with nephrostomy tube. We performed a comparative analysis, studying the possible variables that were related to catheter dislodgement. In addition, a subanalysis was also carried out comparing different catheter designs (Pigtail and Foley) in case this could be related to the dislodgement. Two hundred five cases were collected. A total of 51.2% of cases had a pigtail nephrostomy and 48.8% Foley type, and accidental dislodgement occurred in 26.3% of cases. In multivariate analysis, we observed that first time nephrostomy tube placement entailed higher risk of accidental dislodgement than successive placements (odds ratio [OR] 1.95, confidence interval [CI] 1.01-3.74, = 0.04). In the pigtail-type catheter patient subgroup, tubes placed by a resident were more prone to accidental dislodgement than those placed by an attending physician (OR 3.39, CI 1.29-8.91, = 0.01), while first episode cases were more likely to have become dislodged than in a subsequent event (OR 3.17, CI 1.17-8.57, = 0.02). In addition, the mean (in days) until nephrostomy tube dislodgement in cases where this occurred was 20.32 ± 3.52 for pigtail and 60.92 ± 5.15 for Foley ( < 0.01 in Kaplan-Meier's test). Nephrostomy tube displacement in long-term patients is a common problem. Some factors associated with the catheter could increase the risk of involuntary displacement, such as being a first event or being inserted by less experienced resident doctors. In addition, pigtail type nephrostomies tend toward accidental dislodgement earlier than Foley ones.
为了确定慢性置管患者中意外肾造瘘管移位的可能危险因素,并比较两种不同类型的管在这种情况下的效果。我们对长期带管的患者进行了回顾性研究。我们进行了对比分析,研究了与导管移位相关的可能变量。此外,我们还进行了亚分析,比较了不同的导管设计(猪尾和 Foley),因为这可能与移位有关。共收集了 205 例病例。其中,猪尾型肾造瘘管占 51.2%,Foley 型占 48.8%,意外移位发生率为 26.3%。多变量分析显示,首次肾造瘘管放置比连续放置的意外移位风险更高(比值比 [OR] 1.95,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.01-3.74, = 0.04)。在猪尾型导管患者亚组中,由住院医师放置的导管比由主治医生放置的导管更容易意外移位(OR 3.39,95%CI 1.29-8.91, = 0.01),而首次发作的病例比随后的事件更容易发生移位(OR 3.17,95%CI 1.17-8.57, = 0.02)。此外,在发生肾造瘘管移位的病例中,到肾造瘘管移位的平均(天)时间为猪尾型为 20.32 ± 3.52,Foley 型为 60.92 ± 5.15(Kaplan-Meier 检验 < 0.01)。长期置管患者的肾造瘘管移位是一个常见问题。一些与导管相关的因素会增加非自愿移位的风险,例如首次事件或由经验较少的住院医师插入。此外,猪尾型肾造瘘管比 Foley 型更容易意外移位。