Turcotte Justin J, Stone Andrea H, Gilmor Ruby J, Formica Josephine W, King Paul J
Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):950-954. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.037. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
Compared to general anesthesia (GA), neuraxial anesthesia (NA) has been associated with improved outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We examined the impact of NA on patient outcomes in an institution with an established rapid recovery protocol.
This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of 5914 consecutive primary TJA performed from July 2015 to June 2018. Univariate tests and multivariate regression compared length of stay (LOS), transfusion rates, hematocrit levels, discharge disposition, and emergency room returns between patients receiving GA and NA.
Patients receiving NA had a significantly shorter LOS (total hip arthroplasty [THA]: GA 1.74 vs NA 1.36 days, P < .001; total knee arthroplasty [TKA]: GA 1.77 vs NA 1.64 days, P < .001). Both THA and TKA patients receiving NA were less likely to require transfusion (THA: GA 5.8% vs NA 1.6%, P < .001; TKA: GA 2.5% vs NA 0.5%, P < .001) and had a higher postoperative hematocrit (THA: GA 32.50% vs NA 33.22%, P < .001; TKA GA 33.57 vs NA 34.50%, P < .001). Patients receiving NA were more likely to discharge home (THA: GA 83.4% vs NA 92.3%, P < .001; TKA: GA 83.3% vs NA 86.3%, P = .010) (THA: NA adjusted OR [aOR] 2.04, P < .001; TKA: NA aOR 1.23, P = .048) and had significantly lower rates of 90-day emergency room visits (THA: NA aOR 0.61, P = .005; TKA: NA aOR 0.74, P = .034).
NA appears to contribute to decreased LOS, short-term complications, and transfusions while facilitating home discharge following TKA and THA. These trends are consistent when controlling for patient-specific risk factors, suggesting NA may enhance outcomes for patients with increased age, body mass index, and comorbidities.
Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.
与全身麻醉(GA)相比,全关节置换术(TJA)后采用神经轴索麻醉(NA)与更好的预后相关。我们在一个已建立快速康复方案的机构中研究了NA对患者预后的影响。
这是一项对2015年7月至2018年6月期间连续进行的5914例初次TJA的单机构回顾性分析。单因素检验和多因素回归比较了接受GA和NA的患者之间的住院时间(LOS)、输血率、血细胞比容水平、出院处置情况以及急诊室复诊情况。
接受NA的患者住院时间显著缩短(全髋关节置换术[THA]:GA组为1.74天,NA组为1.36天,P <.001;全膝关节置换术[TKA]:GA组为1.77天,NA组为1.64天,P <.001)。接受NA的THA和TKA患者输血需求均较低(THA:GA组为5.8%,NA组为1.6%,P <.001;TKA:GA组为2.5%,NA组为0.5%,P <.001),且术后血细胞比容更高(THA:GA组为32.50%,NA组为33.22%,P <.001;TKA:GA组为33.57,NA组为34.50%,P <.001)。接受NA的患者更有可能出院回家(THA:GA组为83.4%,NA组为92.3%,P <.001;TKA:GA组为83.3%,NA组为86.3%,P =.010)(THA:NA调整后比值比[aOR]为2.04,P <.001;TKA:NA aOR为1.23,P =.048),且90天急诊室复诊率显著更低(THA:NA aOR为0.61,P =.005;TKA:NA aOR为0.74,P =.034)。
NA似乎有助于缩短TKA和THA后的住院时间、减少短期并发症和输血,同时便于出院回家。在控制患者特定风险因素时,这些趋势是一致的,表明NA可能改善年龄、体重指数和合并症增加患者的预后。
III级回顾性队列研究。