From the Department of Surgery (Bourget-Murray, Mahdavi, Sharma), and the Department of Anaesthesia (Halpenny), University of Calgary; Alberta Health Services (Sharma, Halpenny); Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic (Sharma, Mahdavi, Piroozfar); Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (Piroozfar); McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health (Sharma), Calgary, Alta.
Can J Surg. 2022 Jul 28;65(4):E460-E467. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008821. Print 2022 Jul-Aug.
Compared with general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia has many benefits for patients undergoing total hip (THA) or total knee (TKA) arthroplasty, but few studies have explored rates of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes by anesthetic type for patients undergoing THA or TKA for osteoarthritis.
We identified patients who underwent primary THA or TKA from the affiliated institute's database. We calculated inpatient, 30-day, 60-day and 90-day mortality rates, as well as 90-day perioperative complications, readmissions and length of stay (LOS). We compared outcomes between groups using logistic regression and propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis.
We included 6100 (52.2%) patients undergoing THA and 5580 (47.8%) undergoing TKA. We found no differences by anesthetic type in mortality rates up to 90 days after surgery. Patients under spinal anesthesia were less likely to need a blood transfusion (THA odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.92; TKA OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.67) and were more likely to be discharged home among those who underwent TKA (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.00). Patients who received spinal anesthesia for THA had a longer LOS (0.28 d, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.39), and patients who received spinal anesthesia for TKA had a shorter LOS than those who received general anesthesia (-0.34 d, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.18). Anesthetic type was not associated with any difference in adverse events.
These findings may inform decisions on anesthetic type for total joint arthroplasty, especially for rapid discharge protocols. Further research is needed to understand postoperative pain and functional outcomes between anesthetic types.
与全身麻醉相比,脊髓麻醉在接受全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者中有许多优势,但很少有研究探讨发病率和死亡率。我们旨在比较因关节炎接受 THA 或 TKA 的患者的围手术期结局。
我们从附属医院的数据库中确定了接受初次 THA 或 TKA 的患者。我们计算了住院、30 天、60 天和 90 天的死亡率,以及 90 天围手术期并发症、再入院和住院时间(LOS)。我们使用逻辑回归和倾向调整的多变量分析比较了组间的结果。
我们纳入了 6100 例(52.2%)接受 THA 和 5580 例(47.8%)接受 TKA 的患者。我们发现手术 90 天内死亡率没有因麻醉类型而有所不同。接受脊髓麻醉的患者输血需求较少(THA 比值比 [OR] 0.75,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.60 至 0.92;TKA OR 0.52,95% CI 0.40 至 0.67),并且 TKA 中接受脊髓麻醉的患者更有可能出院回家(OR 1.61,95% CI 1.30 至 2.00)。接受 THA 脊髓麻醉的患者 LOS 较长(0.28 天,95% CI 0.17 至 0.39),而接受 TKA 脊髓麻醉的患者 LOS 比接受全身麻醉的患者短(-0.34 天,95% CI -0.51 至 -0.18)。麻醉类型与任何不良事件均无差异。
这些发现可能为全关节置换术的麻醉类型决策提供信息,尤其是在快速出院方案方面。需要进一步研究来了解麻醉类型之间的术后疼痛和功能结果。