Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):554-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.003. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
Excessive or disharmonious activity of internal and external laryngeal muscles causes a type of dysphonia known as muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). MTD is often diagnosed based on laryngoscopic findings and clinical history. Several diagnostic and classification systems have so far been proposed based on increased supraglottic activity to determine MTD. Various studies have shown that increased supraglottic activity may also be observed in those with normal voice. The present study aimed to precisely examine the incidence of abnormal muscle tension pattern (aMTP) in those with normal voice in comparison with those with MTD. The secondary goal of this study was comparative examination of acoustic parameters and maximum phonation time (MPT) in the group with MTD and normal individuals.
Participants were 75 people with MTD (41 women and 34 men) and 50 individuals with normal voice and no history of dysphonia (20 women and 30 men). Laryngoscopic evaluation was performed for all participants by considering four types of aMTP. Acoustic analyses, including cepstral peak prominence, jitter, shimmer and NHR, as well as MPT examination were performed.
A significant difference between the MTD group and control group was observed in all MTPs except for MTP 2 (lateral-to-medial approximation of the false vocal folds) (P = 0.367, χ(1) = 0.81). In other MTPs, a significant difference existed between the control and MTD groups in terms of aMTP incidence (P < 0.05).
On the four aMTPs, results revealed that one must exercise caution in diagnosing MTD based on MTP 2 (medial compression of ventricular folds), and this must not be the sole criterion for diagnosis. Moreover, cepstral peak prominence and MPT analyses are of high clinical significance.
内外喉肌过度或不协调的活动导致一种称为肌肉紧张性发声障碍(MTD)的发声障碍。MTD 通常基于喉镜检查结果和临床病史进行诊断。迄今为止,已经提出了几种基于声门上活动增加的诊断和分类系统来确定 MTD。多项研究表明,正常声音者也可能观察到声门上活动增加。本研究旨在与 MTD 患者相比,精确检查正常声音者异常肌肉紧张模式(aMTP)的发生率。本研究的次要目标是比较 MTD 组和正常个体的声学参数和最大发音时间(MPT)。
参与者为 75 名 MTD 患者(41 名女性和 34 名男性)和 50 名正常声音且无发声障碍史的个体(20 名女性和 30 名男性)。所有参与者均通过考虑四种类型的 aMTP 进行了喉镜评估。进行声学分析,包括倒谱峰值突出度、抖动、声颤和 NHR 以及 MPT 检查。
除 MTP2(假声带的侧向到内侧接近)外,MTD 组和对照组在所有 MPT 中均存在显著差异(P=0.367,χ(1)=0.81)。在其他 MTP 中,对照组和 MTD 组在 aMTP 发生率方面存在显著差异(P<0.05)。
在四种 aMTP 中,结果表明,基于 MTP2(室带的内侧压缩)诊断 MTD 时必须谨慎,且不能将其作为诊断的唯一标准。此外,倒谱峰值突出度和 MPT 分析具有重要的临床意义。