Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
J Pers Disord. 2020 Sep;34(Suppl B):64-83. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_463. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
Research has demonstrated mentalizing impairment associated with borderline personality disorder (BPD) in adolescents. However, mentalizing performance in adolescents with BPD has never been compared to that of psychiatric control and healthy control adolescents simultaneously. The present study aimed to (a) compare implicit and explicit mentalizing, and hypermentalizing errors in implicit mentalizing, across youth with BPD and psychiatric and healthy controls, and (b) evaluate the association of borderline features with mentalizing deficits over and above internalizing and externalizing. Psychiatric inpatients with BPD ( = 139), inpatient psychiatric controls ( = 310), and healthy adolescents ( = 134) completed two mentalizing tasks, an interview assessing BPD, and measures of psychopathology. Results showed that BPD specificity could be demonstrated only for implicit mentalizing and hypermentalizing. Explicit mentalizing deficits did not differ between BPD and psychiatric control groups. Borderline features had unique associations to implicit mentalizing and hypermentalizing, over and above internalizing and externalizing.
研究表明,边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者存在心理化能力受损。然而,BPD 青少年的心理化表现从未与精神病和健康对照组青少年的心理化表现进行过同时比较。本研究旨在:(a)比较 BPD 青少年与精神病和健康对照组青少年在内隐和外显心理化以及内隐心理化中超心理化错误方面的差异;(b)评估边缘特征与心理化缺陷之间的关系,这些缺陷超出了内化和外化的范围。共有 139 名 BPD 住院患者、310 名住院精神病对照组和 134 名健康青少年完成了两项心理化任务、一项评估 BPD 的访谈以及心理病理学测量。结果表明,仅能证明内隐心理化和超心理化具有 BPD 的特异性。BPD 组与精神病对照组在外显心理化方面没有差异。边缘特征与内隐心理化和超心理化有独特的关联,超出了内化和外化的范围。