Liu Wei, Cao Yubin, Dong Li, Zhu Ye, Wu Yafei, Lv Zongkai, Iheozor-Ejiofor Zipporah, Li Chunjie
West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, No. 14, Section Three, Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041.
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Department of Head and Neck Oncology, No. 14, Section Three, Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 31;12(12):CD009197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009197.pub4.
There may be an association between periodontitis and cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the evidence so far has been uncertain about whether periodontal therapy can help prevent CVD in people diagnosed with chronic periodontitis. This is the second update of a review originally published in 2014, and first updated in 2017. Although there is a new multidimensional staging and grading system for periodontitis, we have retained the label 'chronic periodontitis' in this version of the review since available studies are based on the previous classification system.
To investigate the effects of periodontal therapy for primary or secondary prevention of CVD in people with chronic periodontitis.
Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, two trials registries, and the grey literature to September 2019. We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication. We also searched the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the VIP database, and Sciencepaper Online to August 2019.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared active periodontal therapy to no periodontal treatment or a different periodontal treatment. We included studies of participants with a diagnosis of chronic periodontitis, either with CVD (secondary prevention studies) or without CVD (primary prevention studies).
Two review authors carried out the study identification, data extraction, and 'Risk of bias' assessment independently and in duplicate. They resolved any discrepancies by discussion, or with a third review author. We adopted a formal pilot-tested data extraction form, and used the Cochrane tool to assess the risk of bias in the studies. We used GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.
We included two RCTs in the review. One study focused on the primary prevention of CVD, and the other addressed secondary prevention. We evaluated both as being at high risk of bias. Our primary outcomes of interest were death (all-cause and CVD-related) and all cardiovascular events, measured at one-year follow-up or longer. For primary prevention of CVD in participants with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome, one study (165 participants) provided very low-certainty evidence. There was only one death in the study; we were unable to determine whether scaling and root planning plus amoxicillin and metronidazole could reduce incidence of all-cause death (Peto odds ratio (OR) 7.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 376.98), or all CVD-related death (Peto OR 7.48, 95% CI 0.15 to 376.98). We could not exclude the possibility that scaling and root planning plus amoxicillin and metronidazole could increase cardiovascular events (Peto OR 7.77, 95% CI 1.07 to 56.1) compared with supragingival scaling measured at 12-month follow-up. For secondary prevention of CVD, one pilot study randomised 303 participants to receive scaling and root planning plus oral hygiene instruction (periodontal treatment) or oral hygiene instruction plus a copy of radiographs and recommendation to follow-up with a dentist (community care). As cardiovascular events had been measured for different time periods of between 6 and 25 months, and only 37 participants were available with at least one-year follow-up, we did not consider the data to be sufficiently robust for inclusion in this review. The study did not evaluate all-cause death and all CVD-related death. We are unable to draw any conclusions about the effects of periodontal therapy on secondary prevention of CVD.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people diagnosed with periodontitis and metabolic syndrome, very low-certainty evidence was inconclusive about the effects of scaling and root planning plus antibiotics compared to supragingival scaling. There is no reliable evidence available regarding secondary prevention of CVD in people diagnosed with chronic periodontitis and CVD. Further trials are needed to reach conclusions about whether treatment for periodontal disease can help prevent occurrence or recurrence of CVD.
牙周炎与心血管疾病(CVD)之间可能存在关联;然而,迄今为止的证据尚不确定牙周治疗是否有助于预防被诊断为慢性牙周炎的患者发生CVD。这是对最初发表于2014年、首次更新于2017年的一篇综述的第二次更新。尽管有新的牙周炎多维分期和分级系统,但在本版综述中我们仍保留了“慢性牙周炎”这一术语,因为现有研究是基于先前的分类系统。
探讨牙周治疗对慢性牙周炎患者一级或二级预防CVD的效果。
Cochrane口腔健康信息专家检索了Cochrane口腔健康试验注册库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、两个试验注册库以及截至2019年9月的灰色文献。我们对发表语言和日期未加限制。我们还检索了中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普数据库和中国科技论文在线至2019年8月。
我们纳入了比较积极牙周治疗与无牙周治疗或不同牙周治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们纳入了诊断为慢性牙周炎的参与者的研究,这些参与者既有CVD(二级预防研究),也有无CVD(一级预防研究)。
两位综述作者独立且重复地进行研究识别、数据提取和“偏倚风险”评估。他们通过讨论或与第三位综述作者解决任何差异。我们采用了经过正式预试验的数据提取表,并使用Cochrane工具评估研究中的偏倚风险。我们使用GRADE标准评估证据的确定性。
我们在综述中纳入了两项RCT。一项研究聚焦于CVD的一级预防,另一项涉及二级预防。我们评估这两项研究均存在高偏倚风险。我们感兴趣的主要结局是在一年随访或更长时间时测量的死亡(全因和CVD相关)以及所有心血管事件。对于牙周炎和代谢综合征患者CVD的一级预防,一项研究(165名参与者)提供了极低确定性的证据。该研究中仅有1例死亡;我们无法确定龈下刮治和根面平整联合阿莫西林和甲硝唑是否能降低全因死亡发生率(Peto比值比(OR)7.48,95%置信区间(CI)0.15至376.98),或所有CVD相关死亡发生率(Peto OR 7.48,95% CI 0.15至376.98)。与12个月随访时测量的龈上洁治相比,我们不能排除龈下刮治和根面平整联合阿莫西林和甲硝唑可能增加心血管事件的可能性(Peto OR 7.77,95% CI 1.07至56.1)。对于CVD的二级预防,一项试点研究将303名参与者随机分组,分别接受龈下刮治和根面平整加口腔卫生指导(牙周治疗)或口腔卫生指导加一份X光片复印件以及转诊至牙医处随访的建议(社区护理)。由于心血管事件是在6至25个月的不同时间段进行测量的,且仅有37名参与者有至少一年的随访数据,我们认为这些数据不够可靠,无法纳入本综述。该研究未评估全因死亡和所有CVD相关死亡。我们无法得出关于牙周治疗对CVD二级预防效果的任何结论。
对于被诊断为牙周炎和代谢综合征的患者心血管疾病(CVD)的一级预防,与龈上洁治相比,极低确定性的证据对于龈下刮治和根面平整联合抗生素的效果尚无定论。对于被诊断为慢性牙周炎和CVD的患者CVD的二级预防,没有可靠证据。需要进一步的试验来得出关于牙周疾病治疗是否有助于预防CVD发生或复发的结论。