Giuseppe Frazzetta, Silvia Di Giovanni, Patrizia Rosi, Riccardo Pertile, Antonio Di Sipio, Aldo Rizzo Salvatore, Angela Inviati, Pietro Mascagni, Domenico Mascagni, Luciano Turri
Azienda USL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia.
Presidio Ospedaliero San Cimino, General Surgery Department, via S. Cimino, 90018, Termini Imerese, Sicily, Italy.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Aug 18;48:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.032. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Pilonidal disease is a morbid condition of the young population, that could impair quality of life with a high cost for the health care system. No consensus exists on optimal surgical treatment, even if several techniques have been proposed. In this preliminary case-control study we compared excision by knife and diathermy to investigate if wound dehiscence could be related to heat spreading during excision of the sinus.
Between January 2017 and February 2018, 29 patients underwent to sinus excision.16 patients underwent sinus excision by diathermy (named "Hot" group, case-group) while 13 patients underwent excision by the knife as the control group (named "Cold" group). The temperature data were recorded for both groups. Were considered primary and secondary outcomes.
the cold group has worse outcomes in operative time and blood loss, but better results in post-operative pain at first day and first control, number of weekly and total dressings until healing, time for full wound recovery, days to return to work, patient feeling feedback and scar aspect. Wounds healed within 8-12 days were 84.6% in the Cold group and 18.8% in the Hot one. I° Dindo-Clavien complications were respectively 15.4% and 100.0% for the Cold and Hot group. No differences were recorded for II° Dindo-Clavien complications and in days of hospitalization.
cold excision of the sinus pilonidalis has better results both in terms of precarious healing and quality of life, probably because the tissues are not subjected to diathermocoagulation damage and therefore the healing occurs more quickly. (United States National Institutes of Health, www.clinicaltrial.gov, number NCT03764657, www.researchregistry.com UIN 5003).
藏毛窦疾病是年轻人群中的一种病态状况,会损害生活质量,并给医疗保健系统带来高昂成本。尽管已经提出了几种技术,但对于最佳手术治疗方法尚无共识。在这项初步的病例对照研究中,我们比较了手术刀切除和电刀切除,以调查伤口裂开是否与窦道切除过程中的热扩散有关。
2017年1月至2018年2月期间,29例患者接受了窦道切除。16例患者接受电刀窦道切除(称为“热”组,病例组),而13例患者接受手术刀切除作为对照组(称为“冷”组)。记录了两组的温度数据。将其视为主要和次要结果。
“冷”组在手术时间和失血量方面结果较差,但在术后第一天和首次复查时的疼痛、愈合前每周和总的换药次数、伤口完全恢复时间、恢复工作天数、患者感觉反馈和瘢痕外观方面结果较好。“冷”组8 - 12天内愈合的伤口占84.6%,“热”组为18.8%。“冷”组和“热”组的Ⅰ级Dindo - Clavien并发症分别为15.4%和100.0%。Ⅱ级Dindo - Clavien并发症和住院天数方面无差异。
藏毛窦的冷切除在愈合不稳定和生活质量方面都有更好的结果,可能是因为组织未受到电凝损伤,因此愈合更快。(美国国立卫生研究院,www.clinicaltrial.gov,编号NCT03764657,www.researchregistry.com UIN 5003)