Suppr超能文献

抗真菌药物在角膜冷藏保存液中的成本效益分析。

Cost-Effectiveness of Antifungal Supplementation of Corneal Cold Storage Media.

机构信息

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):582-588. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of supplementing hypothermic cold storage media (CSM) with antifungal therapy.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA).

PARTICIPANT

Base case of a patient with Fuch's endothelial dystrophy undergoing a first eye keratoplasty.

METHODS

Cost-effective analysis of the base case with corneal tissue stored in CSM or CSM supplemented with antifungal therapy over a 16-year time horizon. Multiple clinical scenarios were considered, including endothelial keratoplasty (EK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK); amphotericin B, voriconazole, caspofungin, and combination therapy; and third-party payer and societal perspectives. The incidences were derived from PubMed literature searches and average wholesale prices of medications; all costs were discounted 3% per annum and adjusted for inflation to 2019 US dollars.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

In the reference case, a corneal endothelial graft stored in amphotericin B-supplemented CSM was the most cost-effective approach from a third-party payer and societal perspective. Probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) of the societal model for the EK was robust, with 93.5% being below an arbitrary willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of $20 000 per fungal infection averted. Voriconazole, caspofungin, and combination antifungals were less cost-effective than amphotericin B. The main factors influencing the CEA were the incidences of postkeratoplasty fungal infections, potential increases in graft failures, and antifungal costs. For grafts intended for PKs, antifungal supplementation was less cost-effective than for EKs.

CONCLUSIONS

Antifungal supplementation with amphotericin B for EK grafts was the most cost-effective approach of the studied antifungals; however, the CEA was sensitive to potential changes in graft failure rates, underlining the importance of long-term safety studies. For full-thickness corneal grafts, antifungal supplementation was less cost-effective.

摘要

目的

评估在低温冷藏介质(CSM)中添加抗真菌治疗的成本效益。

设计

成本效益分析(CEA)。

参与者

接受首次角膜移植的 Fuch 内皮营养不良患者的基础病例。

方法

在 16 年的时间范围内,对角膜组织存储在 CSM 或添加抗真菌治疗的 CSM 中的基础病例进行成本效益分析。考虑了多种临床情况,包括内皮角膜移植(EK)和穿透性角膜移植(PK);两性霉素 B、伏立康唑、卡泊芬净和联合治疗;以及第三方付款人和社会视角。发病率源自 PubMed 文献检索和药物的平均批发价格;所有成本均按每年 3%贴现,并按 2019 年的美元进行通胀调整。

主要观察指标

增量成本效益比(ICERs)。

结果

在参考病例中,从第三方付款人和社会角度来看,在两性霉素 B 补充的 CSM 中储存角膜内皮移植物是最具成本效益的方法。EK 的社会模型的概率敏感性分析(PSA)是稳健的,有 93.5%的情况低于避免每例真菌感染的任意意愿支付阈值(WTP)$20000。伏立康唑、卡泊芬净和联合抗真菌药不如两性霉素 B 具有成本效益。影响 CEA 的主要因素是术后真菌性感染的发生率、移植物失败的潜在增加和抗真菌药物的成本。对于用于 PK 的移植物,抗真菌药物的添加不如 EK 有效。

结论

在 EK 移植物中添加两性霉素 B 对抗真菌是研究中最具成本效益的方法;然而,CEA对移植物失败率的潜在变化很敏感,这突出了长期安全性研究的重要性。对于全层角膜移植物,抗真菌药物的添加不太具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验