Ng N, Patton J T, Burnett R, Clement N D
University of Edinburgh Medical School, UK.
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK.
Knee. 2020 Mar;27(2):477-484. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.10.025. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
The position of the femoral component can influence knee kinematics by altering the posterior (PCO) and anterior condylar offset (ACO). The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the length of the cemented stem influences the sagittal position of the femoral component after revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The secondary aim was to determine the influence of the sagittal position on PCO and ACO.
There were 172 consecutive patients over a seven-year period that underwent rTKA with a cemented semi-constrained prosthesis. The 172 patients were separated into two groups: 115 with short stems (50 mm) and 57 with longer stems (100 or 150 mm). Using rotationally acceptable lateral radiographs, the degree of flexion(+)/extension(-) of the femoral components, PCO, and ACO were measured.
There was no significant difference (p > 0.25) between the two groups for sagittal position, PCO, or ACO. The average flexion of the femoral component with short stems was 2.2 ± 4.1° and 2.2 ± 3.4° for long stems (difference = 0.0, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.3 to 1.2). The average PCO ratio was 1.02 ± 0.15 for short stems and 0.99 ± 0.17 for long stems (difference = 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08). The average ACO ratio was at 0.07 ± 0.08 for short stems and 0.08 ± 0.08 for long stems (difference = 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.04). There was a significant correlation between sagittal alignment of the femoral component and PCO (flexion increased PCO, r = 0.39, p < 0.0001) and ACO (flexion decreased ACO, r = -0.34, p < 0.0001).
Cemented stem length does not influence the position of femoral component in the sagittal axis, PCO, or ACO. Surgical technique and sizing of the femoral component may be more predictive.
股骨假体的位置可通过改变后髁偏移(PCO)和前髁偏移(ACO)来影响膝关节运动学。本研究的主要目的是评估骨水泥柄的长度是否会影响翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)后股骨假体在矢状面上的位置。次要目的是确定矢状面位置对PCO和ACO的影响。
在7年期间,连续有172例患者接受了使用骨水泥半限制型假体的rTKA。这172例患者被分为两组:115例使用短柄(50毫米),57例使用长柄(100或150毫米)。使用旋转角度合适的侧位X线片,测量股骨假体的屈曲(+)/伸展(-)角度、PCO和ACO。
两组在矢状面位置、PCO或ACO方面无显著差异(p>0.25)。短柄股骨假体的平均屈曲角度为2.2±4.1°,长柄为2.2±3.4°(差异=0.0,95%置信区间(CI)-1.3至1.2)。短柄的平均PCO比率为1.02±0.15,长柄为0.99±0.17(差异=0.03,95%CI-0.02至0.08)。短柄的平均ACO比率为0.07±0.08,长柄为0.08±0.08(差异=0.01,95%CI-0.01至0.04)。股骨假体的矢状面对线与PCO(屈曲增加PCO,r=0.39,p<0.0001)和ACO(屈曲减少ACO,r=-0.34,p<0.0001)之间存在显著相关性。
骨水泥柄的长度不会影响股骨假体在矢状轴、PCO或ACO上的位置。手术技术和股骨假体的尺寸选择可能更具预测性。