Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Feb;5(2):239-250. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic, relapsing condition with poor treatment outcomes. Both alcohol craving and negative affect increase alcohol drinking, and-in healthy adults-can be attenuated using cognitive strategies, which rely on the prefrontal cortex (PFC). However, AUD is associated with cognitive impairments and PFC disruptions. Thus, we tested whether individuals with AUD can successfully recruit the PFC to effectively regulate craving and negative emotions, whether neural mechanisms are shared between the two types of regulation, and whether individual differences influence regulation success.
During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants with AUD completed the regulation of craving task (n = 17) that compares a cue-induced craving condition with an instructed regulation condition. They also completed the emotion regulation task (n = 15) that compares a negative affect condition with an instructed regulation condition. Regulation strategies were drawn from cognitive behavioral therapy treatments for AUD. Self-reported craving and negative affect were collected on each trial.
Individuals with AUD effectively regulated their craving and negative affect when instructed to do so using cognitive behavioral therapy-based strategies. Regulation was associated with recruitment of both common and distinct PFC regions across tasks, as well as with reduced activity in regions associated with craving and negative affect (e.g., ventral striatum, amygdala). Effective regulation of craving was associated with negative alcohol expectancies.
Both common and distinct regulatory systems underlie regulation of craving and negative emotions in AUD, with notable individual differences. This has important implications for AUD treatment.
酒精使用障碍(AUD)是一种慢性、复发性疾病,治疗效果不佳。酒精渴望和负性情绪都会增加饮酒量,而在健康成年人中,可以通过依赖前额叶皮层(PFC)的认知策略来减轻这种影响。然而,AUD 与认知障碍和 PFC 中断有关。因此,我们测试了 AUD 患者是否能够成功地调动 PFC 来有效地调节对酒精的渴望和负性情绪,两种调节类型的神经机制是否相同,以及个体差异是否会影响调节的成功。
在功能磁共振成像期间,AUD 患者完成了对酒精渴望的调节任务(n=17),该任务比较了一个线索诱导的渴望状态和一个指令调节状态。他们还完成了情绪调节任务(n=15),该任务比较了一个负性情绪状态和一个指令调节状态。调节策略是从 AUD 的认知行为治疗中提取的。在每次试验中都收集了自我报告的对酒精的渴望和负性情绪。
当以基于认知行为疗法的策略指示时,AUD 患者能够有效地调节对酒精的渴望和负性情绪。调节与任务之间共同和独特的 PFC 区域的募集有关,以及与对酒精的渴望和负性情绪相关的区域的活动减少有关(例如,腹侧纹状体、杏仁核)。对酒精的渴望的有效调节与消极的酒精预期有关。
共同和独特的调节系统都为 AUD 中对酒精的渴望和负性情绪的调节提供了基础,且存在显著的个体差异。这对 AUD 的治疗具有重要意义。