Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者戒烟的引导式自我改变疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。

Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Zarghami Mehran, Taghizadeh Fatemeh, Sharifpour Ali, Alipour Abbas

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

出版信息

Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Dec 11;17:90. doi: 10.18332/tid/114227. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of guided self-change (GSC), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and their combination, on smoking cessation among patients with COPD.

METHODS

A total of 60 participants were randomly assigned to three groups for GSC (n=20), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (n=20) or their combination (n=20), from December 2016 to November 2017. The quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, clinical assessment test (CAT) and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), were measured at baseline and post-treatment.

RESULTS

At 6, 12, and 29 weeks, the abstinence rate in the NRT group was 5.3%, 15.8% and 21.1%, in the GSC group 21.1%, 31.6% and 47.4%, and in the combined group 36.8%, 36.8% and 47.4%, respectively. The exhaled CO in the NRT group was greater than the GSC group, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.4; 95% CI: -0.24-7.0; p=0.067), CO levels in the combined group were less than the GSC group, while this difference was also not significant (-0.75; 95% CI : -4.2-2.7; p=0.68). CAT and QoL recovery in the GSC and combined groups were higher than in the NRT group (9.2; 95% CI: 5.0-13.4; p=0.001) and (-4.5; 95% C: -8.1- -0.6; p=0.02), respectively. However, differences between combined and GSC groups were not significant (p=0.24 and p=0.41, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between the abstinence rate in the GSC or combined group and the NRT group (p=0.001). The GEE model showed that GSC reduced the odds of smoking compared with the NRT group (interaction group effect) (OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.022-0.545; p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our context among COPD patients, GSC was more effective in decreasing smoking than NRT alone. Moreover, the recovery of exhaled carbon monoxide, CAT and QoL in GSC was more than in the NRT group. Moreover, since GSC was as effective as GSC plus NRT, the effectiveness of the combination method for smoking cessation in COPD patients may be attributed to GSC.Clinical trial registration details: IRCT201609271457N11; www.irct.ir.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在探讨指导式自我改变(GSC)、尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)及其联合应用对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者戒烟的疗效。

方法

2016年12月至2017年11月,共有60名参与者被随机分为三组,分别接受指导式自我改变(n = 20)、尼古丁替代疗法(n = 20)或两者联合治疗(n = 20)。在基线和治疗后测量生活质量(QoL)问卷、临床评估测试(CAT)和呼出一氧化碳(CO)水平。

结果

在第6、12和29周时,NRT组的戒烟率分别为5.3%、15.8%和21.1%,GSC组分别为21.1%、31.6%和47.4%,联合治疗组分别为36.8%、36.8%和47.4%。NRT组呼出的CO高于GSC组,但差异无统计学意义(3.4;95%CI:-0.24 - 7.0;p = 0.067),联合治疗组的CO水平低于GSC组,差异也无统计学意义(-0.75;95%CI:-4.2 - 2.7;p = 0.68)。GSC组和联合治疗组的CAT和QoL恢复情况高于NRT组,差异有统计学意义(分别为9.2;95%CI:5.0 - 13.4;p = 0.001)和(-4.5;95%CI:-8.1 - -0.6;p = 0.02)。然而,联合治疗组和GSC组之间的差异无统计学意义(分别为p = 0.24和p = 0.41)。GSC组或联合治疗组与NRT组的戒烟率存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.001)。广义估计方程(GEE)模型显示,与NRT组相比,GSC降低了吸烟几率(交互组效应)(OR = 0.3l,95%CI:0.022 - 0.545;p = 0.001)。

结论

在我们的研究中,对于COPD患者,GSC在减少吸烟方面比单独使用NRT更有效。此外,GSC组呼出一氧化碳、CAT和QoL的恢复情况优于NRT组。此外,由于GSC与GSC加NRT一样有效,COPD患者联合戒烟方法的有效性可能归因于GSC。临床试验注册详情:IRCT201609271457N11;www.irct.ir。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45f4/6915435/ea23f231da3d/TID-17-90-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验