Suppr超能文献

基于红光和绿光的光体积描记成像的脉搏血氧饱和度测定法:可校准性和挑战。

Pulse oximetry based on photoplethysmography imaging with red and green light : Calibratability and challenges.

机构信息

Electronic Systems Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Philips Innovation Group, Philips Research, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Feb;35(1):123-133. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00449-y. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

Abstract

Remotely measuring the arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO) in visible light (Vis) involves different probing depths, which may compromise calibratibility. This paper assesses the feasibility of calibrating camera-based SpO (SpO) using red and green light. Camera-based photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals were measured at 46 healthy adults at center wavelengths of 580 nm (green), 675 nm (red), and 840 nm (near-infrared; NIR). Subjects had their faces recorded during normoxia and hypoxia and under gradual cooling. SpO estimates in Vis were based on the normalized ratio of camera-based PPG amplitudes in red over green light (RoG). SpO in Vis was validated against contact SpO (reference) and compared with SpO estimated using red-NIR wavelengths. An RoG-based calibration curve for SpO was determined based on data with a SpO range of 85-100%. We found an [Formula: see text] error of 2.9% (higher than the [Formula: see text] for SpO in red-NIR). Additional measurements on normoxic subjects under temperature cooling (from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]) evidenced a significant bias of - 1.7, CI [- 2.7, - 0.7]%. It was also noted that SpO[Formula: see text] estimated at the cheeks was significantly biased (- 3.6, CI [- 5.7, - 1.5]%) with respect to forehead estimations. Under controlled conditions, SpO[Formula: see text] can be calibrated with red and green light but the accuracy is less than that of SpO[Formula: see text] estimated in the usual red-NIR window.

摘要

在可见光(Vis)中远程测量动脉血氧饱和度(SpO)涉及不同的探测深度,这可能会影响校准的可重复性。本文评估了使用红光和绿光校准基于相机的 SpO(SpO)的可行性。在 46 名健康成年人中,以 580nm(绿光)、675nm(红光)和 840nm(近红外;NIR)的中心波长测量基于相机的光体积描记(PPG)信号。在正常氧合和低氧血症以及逐渐冷却下,记录受试者的面部。Vis 中的 SpO 估计值基于相机 PPG 幅度在红光与绿光(RoG)之间的归一化比值。Vis 中的 SpO 通过与接触 SpO(参考)进行比较,并与使用红光-NIR 波长估计的 SpO 进行比较进行验证。根据 SpO 范围为 85-100%的数据确定了基于 RoG 的 SpO 校准曲线。我们发现了 2.9%的[公式:见文本]误差(高于红光-NIR 中 SpO 的[公式:见文本])。在正常氧合受试者在温度冷却(从[公式:见文本]到[公式:见文本])下的额外测量中,发现了一个显著的偏差为-1.7,CI[-2.7,-0.7]%。还注意到,与额部估计相比,脸颊处估计的 SpO[公式:见文本]存在显著偏差(-3.6,CI[-5.7,-1.5]%)。在受控条件下,可以使用红光和绿光校准 SpO,但准确性低于通常的红光-NIR 窗口中估计的 SpO。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验